2017
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1363264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance by campaign: the co-constitution of food issues, publics and expertise through new information and communication technologies

Abstract: This paper considers food as a site of public engagement with science and technology. Specifically, we focus on how public engagement with food is envisioned and operationalised by one non-profit organisation, foodwatch. Founded in Germany in 2002, foodwatch extensively uses new information and communication technologies to inform consumers about problematic food industry practices. In this paper we present our analysis of 50 foodwatch enewsletters published over a period of one year (2013). We define foodwatc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Holmberg, 2017; Jauho, 2016). Other research has explored how European food activists establish themselves as experts, to mobilize collective action in resistance to national and European Union (EU)-level food governance (Schneider et al, 2019), and how women nonactivists frame their personal experience as “natural maternal knowledge” to cast themselves as having the expertise needed to resist state nutritional authorities (O’Key & Hugh-Jones, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holmberg, 2017; Jauho, 2016). Other research has explored how European food activists establish themselves as experts, to mobilize collective action in resistance to national and European Union (EU)-level food governance (Schneider et al, 2019), and how women nonactivists frame their personal experience as “natural maternal knowledge” to cast themselves as having the expertise needed to resist state nutritional authorities (O’Key & Hugh-Jones, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance observed in the food sector in Iran to Nutrition Traffic Light labelling as opposed to nutrition fact has also been reported in Australia, where the industry was against Traffic Light Labelling and lobbied through the Australian Food and Grocery Council However, the two countries differed with regard to the role of NGOs, as in Iran no NGO has been active to advocate for healthy industrial food products, while in Australia, different stakeholders and NGOs acted in the implementation of the “Health star rating” food labelling program . The Food Upfront campaign that attempted to ask the UK government and food industry to commit to introduce mandatory food labeling and make nutritional labeling clear or the Food watch European advocacy group which focused on protecting nutritional consumer rights are two examples of the role of NGOs in this regard which their absent could be felt in Iran.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taylor-Smith and Smith (2019) conceive (ANT-inspired) "participation spaces" as socio-technical assemblages and model them as Socio-Technical Interaction Networks. Schneider et al (2019) refer to ethno-epistemic assemblages denoting the entanglement of laypeople and experts.…”
Section: Becoming E-petition: An Assemblage-based Framework For Analymentioning
confidence: 99%