2019
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1529556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance conditions for successful ecological restoration of estuaries: lessons from the Dutch Haringvliet case

Abstract: Ecological restoration projects may provide solutions for degraded ecosystems in estuaries, but are challenging due to complex governance processes. Scientific studies on the latter are limited. The aim of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the governance process aiming at ecological restoration in estuaries. Based on a literature review, five success conditions for ecological restoration projects in estuaries were formulated. These conditions concern: (1) the presence of options for experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the literature points to a complex array of factors shaping conflict. Conflicts often involve the reduction in the supply of provisioning services resulting from restoration actions, and thus they mostly concern impacts of restoration on commercial use of natural resources in agriculture, forestry, and fisheries (Flávio et al 2017; Kärvemo et al 2017; Buitenhuis & Dieperink 2019). Conflicts also reflect disagreements between stakeholders' groups prioritizing a set of ecosystem services that are different from provisioning services (Trabucco et al 2008; Drenthen 2009), and social distress resulting from disservices brought by restoration actions (Lyytimäki et al 2008; Handel 2016; Arsénio et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature points to a complex array of factors shaping conflict. Conflicts often involve the reduction in the supply of provisioning services resulting from restoration actions, and thus they mostly concern impacts of restoration on commercial use of natural resources in agriculture, forestry, and fisheries (Flávio et al 2017; Kärvemo et al 2017; Buitenhuis & Dieperink 2019). Conflicts also reflect disagreements between stakeholders' groups prioritizing a set of ecosystem services that are different from provisioning services (Trabucco et al 2008; Drenthen 2009), and social distress resulting from disservices brought by restoration actions (Lyytimäki et al 2008; Handel 2016; Arsénio et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, development and implementation of ecological restoration projects are processes involving the interaction of multiple actors. Such projects are successful when they lead to the recovery and increased resiliency of degraded ecosystems [17].…”
Section: Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful development and implementation of ecological restoration projects in estuaries depend on the application of workable governance conditions. Buitenhuis and Dieperink [17] state that successful restoration projects are those contributing to healthy and resilient ecosystems. They conclude that there is greater success of ecological restoration projects when three conditions are met: 1) when stakeholders provide sufficient project support; 2) when individuals in key positions provide support for the project; and 3) when undertaking research on the target area prior to the development and implementation process of the project.…”
Section: Restoration Of Impacted Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%