Governance of substance use as a by-product of policing in Norway

Abstract

The aim of this article was to study governance of drug use in Norway through a historical account. Method: A genealogy was conducted through the study of documentation and legal texts from the 1600s until contemporary times. Findings: Based on legal texts addressing people using substances (both drugs and alcohol) various strategies for governance of drug use appears. The first section describes the emergence of institutions where people with alcohol problems were confined in a system originating the Dutch discipline houses. The second section describes the poor laws of the 1800s and the practice of the local poorhouses. The third section takes a look at the Vagrancy Act of 1900 and the state-owned labour camp at Opstad. The fourth section discusses the establishment of the sobriety boards and their role in confining alcoholics at cure homes. The fifth section describes developments in post-world-war Norway, with increased attention to illicit substances. Conclusions: The terminology justifying interventions is

Service User Experiences of How Flexible Assertive Community Treatment May Support or Inhibit Citizenship: A Qualitative Study

“…This does not seem to be reflected in the accounts of participants in this study, which may suggest that the positive effects of an egalitarian society do not necessarily extend to everyone (Steckermeier and Delhey, 2019 ). The expressions of self-stigma among participants in this study may be understood in light of the cultural and historical views of substance use problems as self-inflicted, and people with substance use problems and complex needs as “unworthy needy,” which are notions that have been prevalent in Norwegian society (Johansen et al, 2018 ).…”

Open drug scenes and police strategies in Oslo, Norway

“…Loven om edruskapsvern og edruskapsnemnder av 1932 la grunnlaget for et rusbehandlingssystem (Hauge, 2009). Etter loven hadde lokale edruskapsnemnder myndighet til å anholde personer og sette dem under offentlig omsorg, også under tvang (Johansen et al, 2018). Ettersom problemene med avhengighet av andre typer rusmidler tiltok ble det behov for et behandlingstilbud også for denne målgruppen.…”

Work-Related Satisfaction among Clinicians Working at Inpatient Treatment Facilities for Substance Use Disorder: The Role of Recovery Orientation

“…People who need substantial change and development to manage their everyday lives and overcome the psychosocial consequences of SUD, often require specialised inpatient treatment [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. People with SUD have long been the subject of controlling measures in society in general, and in SUD treatment in particular [ 28 , 29 ], and the environment at the services to which people refer to undergo vast change processes, such as inpatient SUD treatment, is tightly controlled [ 30 ]. The treatment practice and the service staff that undertake it perform an essential function in, and exert a profound influence on, inpatients’ everyday lives and their change processes [ 30 ].…”