Governance, privatization and foreign direct investment

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the interplay between economic governance and privatization, and how these two instruments affect the entry mode choice of the foreign firm and the social welfare of the host country. Design/methodology/approach This study constructs a mixed duopoly model wherein one domestic public firm competes with a foreign firm and investigates the influence of economic governance investment on the domestic government’s optimal degree of privatization choice and the foreign firm’s entry mode choice. Findings This study shows that (1) better economic governance enhances the effect of privatization on output, thus resulting in a lower degree of privatization; (2) the optimal privatization policy of the domestic government is partial privatization irrespective of the foreign firm’s entry mode choice; (3) with optimal investment by the domestic government on economic governance, the optimal degree of privatization is higher under FDI than export, and the host-country welfare is also higher under FDI. In particular, this study demonstrates that better economic governance decreases the threshold of the degree of privatization when the foreign firm switches from export to FDI, implying that better economic governance stimulates the foreign firm to undertake FDI in the host country. Practical implications The findings shed some light on both the mixed ownership reform of the SOEs in China and attracting foreign capital inflow to improve the host country’s social welfare. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study constitutes the first attempt to build a theoretical framework to explore how the interactions between economic governance and privatization influence the entry mode choice of the foreign firm.

Impacts of Corruption to Agricultural Export Potential of the Gambia Competitive Neighbours

“…A larger country integrates more into the world to meet its needs. Foreign capital inflow may bring to a certain extent structural activity and higher norms (Sandholtz and Koetzle, 2000;Cai et al, 2018). Baklouti and Baujelbene (2016) support this phenomenon indeed.…”

Can Existing Theories Explain China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment in Belt and Road Countries

“…Good governance in a host country matters for foreign direct investment, and it insures the favorable environment of business. Government effectiveness ensures the consistence of implementing foreign investment policy, and enhances the confidence of foreign investors [52][53][54]. Thus: Hypothesis 12 (H12).…”

The theoretical systems of OFDI location determinants in global north and global south economies

“…In addition to industry-specific factors, environmental factors such as institutional and policy environment are also important determinants of OFDI (Banik and Das, 2014); it guarantees a good business environment. Good governance and efficiency in the host country are critical for FDI, and the effectiveness of the government ensures consistency in the implementation of foreign investment policies and enhances the confidence of foreign investors (Bonnitcha, 2016;Cai et al, 2018;Mishra and Ratti, 2011). Institutional factors are also essential location determinants of OFDI (Buckley et al, 2010).…”