Governing Ignorance: Emerging Catastrophic Risks—Industry Responses and Policy Frictions

Abstract

The growing interconnections between people, markets and networks together with the development of new technologies have increased the frequency and impact of large-scale disasters around the globe. Many of these events, defined as emerging catastrophic (or systemic) risks, have no previous record. At the same time there is a strong probability that their frequency and impact will increase in the future. This paper takes a governance perspective by assuming that policy actions should be designed to cope with ignorance and large-scale losses, being the primary features characterising such emerging catastrophic risks. Precisely, the governance activity should aim both at expanding the industries' capacity to absorb losses and at acquiring more information about frequency and impact of such losses. However, it appears that some solutions may conflict with policy objectives. In particular, direct governmental interventions to compensate victims and stringent antitrust policy goals might block the development of a market for first-party property insurance for emerging systemic risks. This paper elicits crucial points that require further elaboration by policy-makers, thereby stressing the importance of providing a workable legal definition of such line of risk that embraces the precautionary principle.

Don’t Call It a Failure: Systemic Risk Governance for Complex Financial Systems

“…Such intersections constitute new (narrower) systems of rules and logical deductions that enable economic actors to conduct their operations. For example, a transaction in which a bank extends a loan collateralized with the debtor's personal property gives rise to a commercial law intersection represented by the coming together of secured transactions law, contract law, and banking regulation (Castellano andTosato 2021, 1027). As these legal intersections proliferate, law can be conceived as a complex system composed of subsystems that evolve and coalesce, creating smaller unities in fractal-like organizations.…”

Principles for Sustainable Insurance: Risk Management and Value

“…Stahel (2008) suggests that insurers through their underwriting and investment processes can penalize man-made actions that increase atmospheric carbon dioxide and encourage actions that reduce it. Castellano (2010) further suggests that insurers, in cooperation with governments, have a role in creating a resilient system to fund emerging perils, including those from the unpredictable effects of climate change. The suggestions of these authors are similar to actions insurers are taking in compliance with the PSI.…”

Recent Research Developments Affecting Nonlife Insurance—The CAS Risk Premium Project 2011 Update

“…Also covered in the recent literature are government's role as reinsurer of catastrophe risks (Bruggeman et al, 2010) and industry response and policy frictions in catastrophic risk (Castellano, 2010). Many people advocate in this context that an effective flood insurance program should include some elements organized by the government and some organized by the private insurance sector.…”