2002
DOI: 10.1068/a34199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governing Nature: The Reregulation of Resource Access, Production, and Consumption

Abstract: Recent developments in political economy have highlighted the institutional nature of economic processes. Researchers using urban regime theory, for example, have grappled with the role of political coalitions in governing the form and rate of urban growth. Working at a different analytical and spatial scale, regulationists have called attention to the role of extra-economic processes in providing coherence to national and regional economies. These two literatures contain significant differences and should not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robertson's (2006) work on wetland banking, for instance, has shown how the logics and categories of science may not articulate fluidly with those of law and the market, thus disrupting efforts to enlist science (and scientists) in the rollout of market-oriented environmental policies. Further, to the extent that frameworks and practices of environmental governance serve to coordinate and stabilize inherently conflict-prone processes of resource use and environmental conservation (Bridge and Jonas, 2002), science may in fact be a poor arbiter in conflicts between social groups that are involved in-or impacted by-these activities. As Sarewitz (2004) argues, scientific studies often provide opposing parties with relevant, legitimated information to support their argtiments.…”
Section: Science and The Governance Of Nature-society Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robertson's (2006) work on wetland banking, for instance, has shown how the logics and categories of science may not articulate fluidly with those of law and the market, thus disrupting efforts to enlist science (and scientists) in the rollout of market-oriented environmental policies. Further, to the extent that frameworks and practices of environmental governance serve to coordinate and stabilize inherently conflict-prone processes of resource use and environmental conservation (Bridge and Jonas, 2002), science may in fact be a poor arbiter in conflicts between social groups that are involved in-or impacted by-these activities. As Sarewitz (2004) argues, scientific studies often provide opposing parties with relevant, legitimated information to support their argtiments.…”
Section: Science and The Governance Of Nature-society Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, articulation of neoliberal reforms has been very uneven. Bridge & Jonas (2002) argued that ''the dialectic of deregulation-re-regulation is contingent on political struggle and plays out differently between different sectors, across geographical contexts, and at different spatial scales. Indeed, market liberalisation is not as hegemonic as first appears' ' (p. 761).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the full extent of the water demands and related management issues, we need a political economy approach to the environment that recognizes economic processes and the governance of nature 'embedded within, and mediated through, the specifi c practices and institutional frameworks' of regions and places (Bridge and Jonas, 2002). Despite hydropower and water supply, the economic activity that nowadays consumes the largest volume of water in the Douro is agriculture irrigation, which corresponds to 114 000 hectares of crop production (INAG, 2005).…”
Section: Nature Production In the Douro Catchmentmentioning
confidence: 99%