2020
DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2020.1857824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governing ‘places that don’t matter’: agonistic spatial planning practices in Finnish peripheral regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many planning actors in Finland share the understanding that tackling challenges resulting from the growth of metropolitan areas is a key task for planning at the regional scale. This is a significant deviation from earlier attitudes about regional planning, which emphasised balanced development and safeguarding services and economic livelihoods throughout the country (Mattila et al, 2020). The task of regional planning in this context was often to address planning issues and regulate land uses in rural and peripheral areas for which no detailed master plan existed.…”
Section: Innovative Practices In Single Regionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Many planning actors in Finland share the understanding that tackling challenges resulting from the growth of metropolitan areas is a key task for planning at the regional scale. This is a significant deviation from earlier attitudes about regional planning, which emphasised balanced development and safeguarding services and economic livelihoods throughout the country (Mattila et al, 2020). The task of regional planning in this context was often to address planning issues and regulate land uses in rural and peripheral areas for which no detailed master plan existed.…”
Section: Innovative Practices In Single Regionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…But people know each other. (Interviewee 8,Lapland Regional Council) While actors in Lapland often feel alienated from the central government and the Helsinki capital region in the South of Finland, they consider themselves as part of the European Union and see an ally in the EU (Mattila et al, 2020). The support from the EU level includes both financial resources distributed to the region in the context of EU Cohesion Policy and conceptual and discursive influences related to urban and regional planning.…”
Section: Regional Planning Cultures In Finnish Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, these revengeful and antagonistic attitudes can affect the administration of marginal places even when electoral results do not reflect a populist shift. For example, marginal places can adopt an antagonistic attitude also in relation to the definition of their local identity and its consequences for planning decisions and processes (Mattila et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%