2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governing the progress of internet-of-things: Ambivalence in the quest of technology exploitation and user rights protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same is true when manufacturers choose modern environmental economic companies. Quantitative studies on the level of system collaboration, the way of system collaboration, and the construction of collaborative system are lacking [ 17 , 18 ]. Under the preparation of order parameters, the original disordered regional environmental economic industry absorption forms a new spatial and temporal cooperative state, and the regional environmental economic industry cluster appears.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same is true when manufacturers choose modern environmental economic companies. Quantitative studies on the level of system collaboration, the way of system collaboration, and the construction of collaborative system are lacking [ 17 , 18 ]. Under the preparation of order parameters, the original disordered regional environmental economic industry absorption forms a new spatial and temporal cooperative state, and the regional environmental economic industry cluster appears.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a free, democratic society to function, the human user needs protection from harmful outcomes, which in the world of ubiquitous and intelligent sensor networks translates into an unwavering commitment to the privacy protection of human users (Zuboff 2019;Cheryl et al 2021). Most often, this is technically translated into the protection of users' privacy and their data (Kounoudes and Kapitsaki 2020).…”
Section: Intended Design Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They should set regulations and legislation that protect consumers' data when using IoT devices, monitor IoT manufacturers and announce legal punishments (El-Haddadeh et al , 2019; Lee, 2019b). Governments or regulators must set new legislation to curb cybercrime and coordinate efforts against cybersecurity threats (Cheryl et al , 2021). Based on Lee (2019a), supporting the improvement of interoperability standards for IoT devices through governments is recommended.…”
Section: Practical Implications and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%