2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governing the transition to renewable energy: A review of impacts and policy issues in the small hydropower boom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
1
85
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydropower for electricity generation was introduced in the 19th century. Now, hydropower technology is used by more than 160 countries globally . Top countries producing electricity from hydropower are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Renewable Energy In the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydropower for electricity generation was introduced in the 19th century. Now, hydropower technology is used by more than 160 countries globally . Top countries producing electricity from hydropower are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Renewable Energy In the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Kelly‐Richards et al . ), and so we have chosen to include reach‐scale effects to assist in gaining a better understanding of the resulting basin‐scale impacts of multiple hydropower plants. The impacts of small hydropower dams on evolutionary processes have rarely been examined in previous reviews, but inclusion of such processes is critical for understanding the effects of these facilities on biodiversity.…”
Section: The Three Most Common Types Of Small Run‐of‐river Hydropowermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objectives of this article are to (1) review the current state of knowledge about the impacts of small hydropower plants on biodiversity and ecosystem function at multiple spatial scales, (2) assess the availability of spatial planning tools, and (3) identify existing knowledge gaps. It has been suggested that the cumulative effects of multiple small hydropower plants and their interactions with other anthropogenic stressors are two major knowledge gaps for basin-scale hydropower planning (Anderson et al 2015;Winemiller et al 2016;Kelly-Richards et al 2017), and so we have chosen to include reachscale effects to assist in gaining a better understanding of the resulting basin-scale impacts of multiple hydropower plants. The impacts of small hydropower dams on evolutionary processes have rarely been examined in previous reviews, but inclusion of such processes is critical for understanding the effects of these facilities on biodiversity.…”
Section: Front Ecol Environmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, these impacts have contributed to opposition to new construction, hindered licensing and relicensing by the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of existing facilities, and motivated several large dam removals (Kosnik 2005, 2008, 2010a, Abbasi and Abbasi 2011, US Army Corps of Engineers 2018, US National Park Service 2018. For these and other reasons, since 2000 hydropower capacity in the United States has grown less than 2% (Johnson and Hadjerioua 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, alternate hydropower technologies exist that may not face such trade-offs. In particular, this paper focuses on small-scale hydropower, which is often defined as ranging in capacity from 1-10 MW (Paish 2002, Kosnik 2010b, International Renewable Energy Agency 2012, Kelly-Richards et al 2017. Small-scale hydropower has a total installed capacity in the United States of only 6 GW (US Energy Information Administration 2017), but substantial resources exist for additional deployment (Johnson and Hadjerioua 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%