Case Studies in E-Government 2.0 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08081-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government 2.0: A Change Towards Citizen Participation in Arab Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subsequent research paradigm concentrates on the properties of social media platforms that help e-governments better serve citizens (Linders, 2012). The world's scholars grabbed the line in 2011 to understand better the social media features that can provide knowledge transfer between governments and citizens (O'Hara & Shadbolt, 2014; Azab et al, 2015). Lee and Kwak (2012) have presented another paradigm classi cation on open government policies through social media.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent research paradigm concentrates on the properties of social media platforms that help e-governments better serve citizens (Linders, 2012). The world's scholars grabbed the line in 2011 to understand better the social media features that can provide knowledge transfer between governments and citizens (O'Hara & Shadbolt, 2014; Azab et al, 2015). Lee and Kwak (2012) have presented another paradigm classi cation on open government policies through social media.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should consider not only the advantages of the social media but also its disadvantages as well. This may also cause online interactive participation obstruct due to formal and informal constraints, such as limited Internet access (Maamari and Zein 2014;Neumayer and Raffl 2008;Sri and Melissa 2012), low technology literacy, demographic factors (Azab et al 2015), illiberal government (Abbott, MacDonald, and Givens 2013), legal and ethical barriers, and government censorship and social media blockage (Abbott, MacDonald, and Givens 2013;Carlo Bertot, Jaeger, and Grimes 2012;Kamel 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%