2003
DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government advertising and the creation of national myths: the Canadian case

Abstract: Government advertising in Canada has a long history and has been an important adjunct in fostering values of national unity. This paper examines several significant campaigns: early 20th century immigration advertising, patriation of the Canadian constitution in the 1980s and, more recently, Olympic advertising in 1998. It attempts to demonstrate that the use of state advertising in Canada is unique in helping foster a view of Canadian citizenship and the development of national myths. Moreover, advertising in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strong association with dense cultural and symbolic values open to exploitation along with consumption products and commercial artifacts enables a brand to assume value beyond its nominal exchange value (Brown et al , 2003; Holt, 2004). Myths, as stories that are passed down from one generation to the next, are an integral part of any nation-state and “not judged on their veracity but rather their metaphorical and symbolic meaning” (Rose, 2003, p. 154). By performing myths, brands feed cultural desires and through complex interactions and high symbolic content meet society’s desires and address cultural contradictions and ambiguities (Holt, 2004, 2006; Urde and Greyser, 2015), thus providing a lever for marketization.…”
Section: Conceptual Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong association with dense cultural and symbolic values open to exploitation along with consumption products and commercial artifacts enables a brand to assume value beyond its nominal exchange value (Brown et al , 2003; Holt, 2004). Myths, as stories that are passed down from one generation to the next, are an integral part of any nation-state and “not judged on their veracity but rather their metaphorical and symbolic meaning” (Rose, 2003, p. 154). By performing myths, brands feed cultural desires and through complex interactions and high symbolic content meet society’s desires and address cultural contradictions and ambiguities (Holt, 2004, 2006; Urde and Greyser, 2015), thus providing a lever for marketization.…”
Section: Conceptual Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its origins in American politics, it is regularly used to describe Canadian politics. Government advertising in Canada is nothing new, nor has it ever been entirely without partisanship (ROSE 2003). However, there have been growing concerns about the use of public money for partisan communication purposes by the government -also called "resource exploitation" (ESSELMENT et al, 2017).…”
Section: Promise Fulfilment Of the Liberals' Open And Fair Elections Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of myth as a system of representation has been a cornerstone of media and cultural studies (Hall 1997;Barthes 1957) and has been advocated for and used in critical, positivist and even historical advertising studies (Cronin 2004b;Domzal/Kernan 1992;Johar et al 2001;Lannon/ Cooper, 1983;McCracken 1987;Mick 1986;Parker 1998;Randazzo 1993;Sherry 1987;Solomon 1983;West 1996;Williamson 1978). Very few studies, however, have connected advertising, myth, and national culture (Perry 1994;Turner 1993;Rose 2003) and none have based their analysis on extended corpuses of advertising messages.…”
Section: Advertising and National Culture Are Inextricably Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%