2020
DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2020.1822196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government Control, Regulatory Enforcement Actions, and the Cost of Equity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the plausibility of the parallel trends assumption underlying the DID design, we conduct two placebo tests and a dynamic DID analysis following prior research (e.g., Ben‐Nasr et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2020; Liao et al., 2021; Ryou et al., 2022; Tsang et al., 2021; 2022; Wang et al., 2022). The first (second) placebo test restricts our sample to the pre‐CSR (post‐CSR) disclosure period and sets the pseudo CSR reporting start year as 2 years before (after) the actual first‐time CSR disclosure year.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the plausibility of the parallel trends assumption underlying the DID design, we conduct two placebo tests and a dynamic DID analysis following prior research (e.g., Ben‐Nasr et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2020; Liao et al., 2021; Ryou et al., 2022; Tsang et al., 2021; 2022; Wang et al., 2022). The first (second) placebo test restricts our sample to the pre‐CSR (post‐CSR) disclosure period and sets the pseudo CSR reporting start year as 2 years before (after) the actual first‐time CSR disclosure year.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One concern with the DiD design is that the reduction in CSR reporting may precede the reduction in tariffs. To address this concern, we follow prior studies (Bourveau et al 2018; Tsang, Hu, et al 2021; Tsang, Wang, et al 2021; Wang et al 2020) and conduct a trend analysis by decomposing the occurrence of a tariff reduction into separate periods relative to the tariff reduction event in year t for each industry 32 . This dynamic DiD model allows us to examine the difference in CSR reporting between the treatment and control firms during the four years preceding the tariff reduction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the effect of corporate governance reforms on analyst forecast accuracy, we follow the literature on the impact of regulations and reforms and use a staggered DID model (e.g., Fauver et al ., 2017; Liao et al ., 2022; Ryou et al ., 2022; Tsang et al ., 2022b; Wang et al ., 2022):italicFERROR_italicWIN90ijtgoodbreak=β0goodbreak+β10.25emPOSTjtgoodbreak+β20.25emAFijtgoodbreak+β30.25emSIZEijtgoodbreak+β40.25emLEVijtgoodbreak+β50.25emSTDROEijtgoodbreak+β60.25emCORRijtgoodbreak+β70.25emADRijtgoodbreak+β80.25emSURPRIZEijtgoodbreak+β90.25emINDSIZEijtgoodbreak+β100.25emHHIijtgoodbreak+italicYearFEgoodbreak+italicCountryFEgoodbreak+εijt where i indexes firm, j indexes country, and t indexes year. The sample is restricted to firms in countries that have experienced corporate governance reforms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we examine the quantity and quality of management earnings forecasts, given that management earnings forecasts are an important input to analysts’ information set (Waymire, 1986; Zhu et al ., 2022). Specifically, we employ three measures of management earnings forecasts, in line with the literature (e.g., Guan et al ., 2020; Wang et al ., 2022; Zhu et al ., 2022): (1) forecast frequency ( MF_ISSUE ), which is an indicator variable equal to one if the firm issues a management earnings forecast in a given year, and zero otherwise; (2) management earnings forecast precision ( MF_PREC ), which takes the value one for forecasts that only provide the minimum or maximum value of the forecasted earnings, two for closed range forecasts, and three for point forecasts; and (3) management earnings forecast error ( MF_FERROR ), which is calculated as the absolute difference between management's earnings forecast and actual EPS scaled by actual EPS, where management's earnings forecasts are either point forecasts or the midpoint of range forecasts. The frequency of management earnings forecasts captures the quantity of the disclosure, and management earnings forecast precision and forecast error capture its quality.…”
Section: Additional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%