2022
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2115973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government controlling ownership and CEO compensation incentives: evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the correlation between pay-performance sensitivity and company performance is even stronger for state-owned enterprises than for non-state-owned enterprises. In fact, the effect of executive pay incentives on improving company performance is at least as significant as that of non-state-owned enterprises [41]. The Chinese government's "Guiding Opinions" introduce salary control measures that limit incentives and align management's interests with those of shareholders.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the correlation between pay-performance sensitivity and company performance is even stronger for state-owned enterprises than for non-state-owned enterprises. In fact, the effect of executive pay incentives on improving company performance is at least as significant as that of non-state-owned enterprises [41]. The Chinese government's "Guiding Opinions" introduce salary control measures that limit incentives and align management's interests with those of shareholders.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%