Government intervention and technological innovation in the wind power industry in China: The role of industrial environmental turbulence

Jiang, Zihao; Shi, Jiarong

doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121265

Cited by 17 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 160 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Supportive policies can mitigate the financial constraints faced by enterprises, enabling them to employ more skilled R&D personnel and acquire advanced experimental equipment through resource and certification effects (González et al, 2012; Li et al, 2021). Supportive policies also help reduce entrepreneurs' perception of risk, increase prospects of future returns, and increase the R&D investments of enterprises (Jiang & Shi, 2023; Jiang, Shi, & Liu, 2022; Wong et al, 2009). They also signal to society that supported wind power enterprises conform to government expectations, weakening information asymmetry and helping these enterprises obtain external financial support (Gao et al, 2021; Hyytinen & Toivanen, 2005).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study collected 278 wind power innovation policies from 2006 to 2020, which can be divided into two categories—supportive and regulatory policies (as depicted in Figure 1) (Jiang & Liu, 2021a, 2021b; Jiang & Shi, 2023; Wang et al, 2020). Supportive policy is a direct and indirect incentive from the government to wind power enterprises, while the regulatory policy is a mandatory requirement for the technology and products of these enterprises (Jiang et al, 2022b; Wang et al, 2019, 2020).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quantity or quality? Policy effects on innovations in the wind power industry in China

Jiang

Shi

2023

Manage Decis Econ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluates the effects of policy on the quantity and quality of innovations based on microdata collected from Chinese enterprises from 2006 to 2020 and then identifies the moderating effect of technological opportunity. The results indicate that while policy significantly increases the quantity of innovation, it inhibits its quality, and when technological opportunities are added to this mix, it does not significantly moderate the impact of policy on innovation quantity but does weaken its negative effect on innovation quality.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quantity or quality? Policy effects on innovations in the wind power industry in China

Jiang

Shi

2023

Manage Decis Econ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, such practices will ultimately obstruct the progress of the digital economy. Furthermore, a high degree of government intervention often leads to an increase in public expenditures on research and development (R&D) [54]. This, in turn, intensifies competition for innovation resources and encourages rent-seeking behavior among innovation actors [55].…”

Section: Digital Economy Green Technology Innovation and Government I...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of the Digital Economy on Total-Factor Carbon Emission Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin from the Perspectives of Mediating and Moderating Roles

Nie,

Bao,

Song

et al. 2024

Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

China’s digital economy has been expanding rapidly in the past decade. This expansion is having a profound impact on the country’s economy. Using panel data on 97 prefecture-level cities in the Yellow River Basin from 2011 to 2020, this study investigates the multifaceted relationship between the digital economy and total-factor carbon emission efficiency. The research yields three key findings: (1) The digital economy positively enhances overall carbon emission efficiency. This conclusion is drawn with robustness tests. (2) Green technology innovation serves as a partial mediator between the digital economy and total-factor carbon emission efficiency, and this mediation role is influenced by government intervention, which negatively moderates the relationship between the digital economy and green technology innovation but positively impacts the mediation role of green technology innovation between the digital economy and total-factor carbon emission efficiency. (3) The positive impact of the digital economy on total-factor carbon emission efficiency is more significant in the upper reaches, lower reaches, and resource-based cities of the Yellow River Basin. These findings provide new perspectives and empirical evidence for better understanding the relationship between digital economy development and total-factor carbon emission efficiency. They also provide policy recommendations for achieving strategic objectives, including digital economy development, carbon emission reduction, carbon peaking, and carbon neutrality.

show abstract

Revealing the multiple impact mechanism of digital economy on renewable energy development in China

Ma,

Yuan,

2024

Clean Techn Environ Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Government intervention and technological innovation in the wind power industry in China: The role of industrial environmental turbulence

Cited by 17 publications

References 160 publications

Quantity or quality? Policy effects on innovations in the wind power industry in China

Quantity or quality? Policy effects on innovations in the wind power industry in China

The Impact of the Digital Economy on Total-Factor Carbon Emission Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin from the Perspectives of Mediating and Moderating Roles

Revealing the multiple impact mechanism of digital economy on renewable energy development in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About