2012
DOI: 10.1108/01443581211255620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Government size, public debt and real economic growth: a panel analysis

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of the size of government and public debt on real economic growth, for a panel of 175 countries around the world.Design/methodology/approachThe paper utilizes the fixed‐effects and random‐effects techniques to estimate the panel regressions.FindingsThe results indicate that both the size of government and the extent of government indebtedness have negative effects on economic growth.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that the authorities ought t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The governing party knowing this makes effort to show their capability by manipulating economic policies prior to elections, which leads to fiscal deficits and high inflation in an election year. And as found by William and Emmanuel (2012), high government indebtedness affects economic growth negatively. Block (2002) shows evidence of the presence of PBCs in the emerging democracies of the developing countries.…”
Section: Theoretical Argumentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The governing party knowing this makes effort to show their capability by manipulating economic policies prior to elections, which leads to fiscal deficits and high inflation in an election year. And as found by William and Emmanuel (2012), high government indebtedness affects economic growth negatively. Block (2002) shows evidence of the presence of PBCs in the emerging democracies of the developing countries.…”
Section: Theoretical Argumentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This generalization has resulted in ideological differences among various economists on the effect of increasing capital flows on macroeconomic indicators. Whereas extant empirical studies (Eberhardt & Presbitero, 2015;Gui-Diby, 2014;Sulaiman & Azeez, 2012;Sedik & Sun, 2012;Mody & Murshid, 2011;Aizenman & Spiegel, 2006;Sachs et al, 2004) support this assertion; other evidences especially from Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) suggest contrasting results in the absence of some mitigating factors (Mensah, Bokpin, & Boachie-Yiadom, 2018;Agbloyor, Gyeke-Darko, Kuipo, & Abor, 2016;Zouhaier & Fatma, 2014;Panizza & Presbitero, 2014;DiPeitro & Anoruo, 2012;Presbitero, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that government borrowing is necessary for the government in order to meet budgetary promises. Debt is not entirely bad as some studies have painted it (DiPeitro & Anoruo, 2012;Easterly, 2003;Collier & Dollar, 2002) but it depends on how the debt is used. If government debt goes into the right investment, it could pay for itself and trigger growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seriousness of this issue, especially in Africa, is exacerbated by the recent global financial crisis and the quest by various governments around the world to revamp their economy with borrowed funds [1,2]. For several reasons, developing countries tend to rely on borrowed funds, foreign equity portfolio investment (FEPI) and foreign direct investment (FDI) flows to harness and grow the economy [3,4]. Moreover, given the low level of domestic economic activities to guarantee quality internally generated funds, the use of external debt by developing countries to address the challenges of economic growth and development has become an issue of a necessity that is difficult to avoid rather than a choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%