2021
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjab013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governors in Control: Executive Orders, State-Local Preemption, and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: The nation’s governors took strong and decisive action in responding to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, often directly affecting their local governments. These actions allow us to examine this question: Will governors’ actions in an unprecedented emergency situation centralize the authority of the state or rely on local governments to deal with localized problems? Additionally, what factors affect those decisions? We examine all governors’ executive orders affecting local governments in the first five months of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those rules fundamentally determine the extent to which state governments decentralize power to localities; thus, unsurprisingly, their design and efficacy have been repeatedly debated since their inception (Kincaid & Stenberg, 2011; Rose, 2010). The ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic is no exception to that debate, as tensions between mayors and state officials (legislators and governors) have unfolded across states concerning how to best respond to public health challenges (McDonald et al, 2020; Weissert et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those rules fundamentally determine the extent to which state governments decentralize power to localities; thus, unsurprisingly, their design and efficacy have been repeatedly debated since their inception (Kincaid & Stenberg, 2011; Rose, 2010). The ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic is no exception to that debate, as tensions between mayors and state officials (legislators and governors) have unfolded across states concerning how to best respond to public health challenges (McDonald et al, 2020; Weissert et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convoluted policies regarding mask use from local and state governments likely contributed to this type of interpersonal conflict. It is notable that the state and local governments in Arizona were often at odds about mask mandates during this time ( Weissert et al , 2021 ). Agencies that focus on a population’s well-being, like local nonprofit organizations, industry-specific trade groups, or health clinics, are important community-level resources that can work with businesses to help them disentangle the confusing and opposing views of policy makers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While scholars have analyzed conflict over COVID-19 in federal systems across several dimensions, limited research has focused specifically on intra-state conflicts, i.e., between branches and levels of government within states. To date, research has included discussions of state preemption of local governments, resiliency in local governments, the ways in which states have delegated enforcement responsibility, and the ways in which some local or state governments have coordinated and cooperated with others (Dzigbede, Gehl, and Willoughby 2020;McDonald, Goodman and Hatch 2020;Weissert et al 2021;Curley and Federman et al 2021;Curley, Harrison, and Federman 2021). However, intra-state conflict remains understudied, and therefore we focus here on outlining some of the areas in which federalism has been addressed in the context of COVID-19 from that perspective.…”
Section: Federalism Covid-19 and Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%