2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPR and ERT explorations at the archaeological site of Kılıç village (Isparta, SW Turkey)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ERT methods have been widely used as powerful tools in archaeological prospecting in order to provide high‐resolution images of the subsurface (Hawamdeh et al ., 2015; Sapia et al ., 2017; Tsokas et al ., 2018; Yilmaz et al ., 2019). ERT is an active geophysical technique for imaging subsurface structures by using multi‐electrode electrical measurements made at the surface.…”
Section: Geophysical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ERT methods have been widely used as powerful tools in archaeological prospecting in order to provide high‐resolution images of the subsurface (Hawamdeh et al ., 2015; Sapia et al ., 2017; Tsokas et al ., 2018; Yilmaz et al ., 2019). ERT is an active geophysical technique for imaging subsurface structures by using multi‐electrode electrical measurements made at the surface.…”
Section: Geophysical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical methods can therefore serve as fast, cheap and nondestructive tools in determining locations for prospective excavation (Reynolds, 2011; Gündoğdu et al ., 2017; Karaaslan and Karavul, 2018). A number of geophysical techniques have been used to investigate archaeological sites, including direct current resistivity, magnetic, ground‐penetrating radar (GPR), electromagnetic, microgravity and seismic methods (Jeng et al ., 2003; Rizzo et al ., 2005; Batayneh et al ., 2007; Müller et al ., 2009; Zhao et al ., 2013; Rabbel et al ., 2014; Martinez et al ., 2015; Di Maio et al ., 2016; Gündoğdu et al ., 2017; Akca et al ., 2019; Florio et al ., 2019; Křivánek, 2019; Lulewicz et al ., 2019; Orlando et al ., 2019; Yilmaz et al ., 2019). Ultimately, the adoption of geophysical techniques in archaeology is not only to the advantage of archaeologists, but also constitutes a precious resource for decision‐makers involved in the protection of human heritage (Hegyi et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, applied geophysics in archaeology is carried out in the early stages of a subsurface investigation, before any other invasive actions that could damage potential hidden structures, as a useful tool to guide and support all the whole process [7,8]. Among all the geophysical techniques, the electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) method is one of the most common technique used in archaeology [9][10][11][12][13]. Due to the fact that resistivity is a www.videleaf.com characteristic electrical property of the rock materials and it is related to their lithology, fracturing, saturation, and fluid content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical resistivity prospection specifically proved to be an effective method to characterize the subsoil and materials in various fields of study, such as applied geology [2][3][4], hydrogeology [5,6], engineering [7][8][9], environmental sciences [10,11], and agriculture [12][13][14]. This method is widely used for archaeological surveys: many past research has shown that the variations of electrical resistivity are often related to walls, floorings, paving and burials [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. These structures are generally characterized by different electrical properties compared to the geological layers that, over time, have buried them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%