GPs' beliefs about their management of depression and needs for supporting change in practice.

Byng, Richard; Weaver, Lyndell; Bury, Catherine

doi:10.1185/135525703125002153

Cited by 2 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An individualised approach based on a wide range of management options was favoured [ 30 , 34 - 36 , 43 , 44 ]. However, clinicians reported using antidepressants, psychological therapies, listening and specialist services.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…GPs commonly considered this their only option due to a lack of availability of psychological therapy or other specialist services [ 31 , 32 ]. However, despite beliefs that antidepressants are effective,[ 35 , 39 ] it was found that prescribing guidelines were not always followed and prescriptions were for too low a dose and for too short a time [ 40 , 44 , 45 ]. Prescribing may be influenced by perceptions of patients' attitudes to antidepressants,[ 34 , 40 ] although GPs reported strategies to overcome negative beliefs [ 34 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Managing depression in primary care: A meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research from the UK to identify barriers and facilitators

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCurrent management in primary care of depression, with or without comorbid physical illness, has been found to be suboptimal. We therefore conducted a systematic review to identify clinician perceived barriers to and facilitators for good depression care.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search to identify qualitative and quantitative studies published in the UK since 2000 of GPs' and practice nurses' attitudes to the management of depression. We used principles from meta-ethnography to identify common and refuted themes across studies.ResultsWe identified 7 qualitative and 10 quantitative studies; none concerned depression and co-morbid physical illness of any kind. The studies of managing patients with a primary diagnosis of depression indicated that GPs and PNs are unsure of the exact nature of the relationship between mood and social problems and of their role in managing it. Among some clinicians, ambivalent attitudes to working with depressed people, a lack of confidence, the use of a limited number of management options and a belief that a diagnosis of depression is stigmatising complicate the management of depression.ConclusionsDetection and management of depression is considered complex. In particular, primary care clinicians need guidance to address the social needs of depressed patients. It is not known whether the same issues are important when managing depressed people with co-morbid physical illness.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing depression in primary care: A meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research from the UK to identify barriers and facilitators

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Seven qualitative [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and 10 quantitative studies of the management of primary depression were included. [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Figure 1 shows the flow of studies through the review process.…”

Section: Review Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Attitudes to managing depression GP responses to chronic depression 37 Interactional difficulties with depressed people 42 Pessimistic about outcome 43 Positive about outcome 40,41 Lack of confidence in managing depression 39,46,48,53 Ambivalence 49,51 GPs and PNs experience frustration in managing depression. Some are confident about outcomes, but commonly there is ambivalence…”

Section: Relationships Between Professionalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…GP goals and management approach 37 GPs' accounts of diagnosing and caring for patients with depression 40 GPs experience of the diagnosis and management of depression 43 Importance of listening 37 Time as a barrier to listening 42 Time and consultation length, disclosure, antidepressants, time management 41 Management of late-life depression in primary care 39 Antidepressant use 44,[47][48][49]52 Role of specialist services 50 Managing depression 46 Clinicians used antidepressants, talking therapies, listening and specialist services. Listening to depressed patients takes time; this may be a barrier to effective treatment, but one in-depth study contested this…”

Section: Management Strategies and Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

UPBEAT-UK: a programme of research into the relationship between coronary heart disease and depression in primary care patients

Tylee

Barley

Walters

et al. 2016

Programme Grants Appl Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundDepression is common in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) but the relationship is uncertain. In the UK, general practitioners (GPs) have been remunerated for finding depression in CHD patients; however, it is unclear how to manage these patients.ObjectivesOur aim was to explore the relationship between CHD and depression in a GP population and to develop nurse-led personalised care (PC) for patients with CHD and depression.DesignThe UPBEAT-UK study consisted of four related studies. A cohort study of patients from CHD registers to explore the relationship between CHD and depression. A metasynthesis of relevant literature and two qualitative studies [patients’ perspectives and GP/practice nurse (PN) views on management of CHD and depression] helped develop an intervention. A pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of PC was conducted.SettingThirty-three GP surgeries in south London.ParticipantsAdult patients on GP CHD registers.InterventionsFrom the qualitative studies, we developed nurse-led PC, combining case management and self-management theory. Following biopsychosocial assessment, a PC plan was devised for each patient with chest pain and depressive symptoms. Nurses helped patients address their most important related problems. Use of existing resources was promoted. Nurse time was conserved through telephone follow-up.Main outcome measuresThe main outcome of the pilot study of our newly developed PC for people with depression and CHD was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and to decide on the best outcome measures. Depression, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – depression subscale, and chest pain, measured by the Rose angina questionnaire, were the main outcome measures for the feasibility and cohort studies. Cardiac outcomes in the cohort study included: attendance at rapid access chest pain clinics, stent insertion, bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Service use and costs were measured and linked to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Data for the pilot RCT were obtained by research assistants from patient interviews at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months for the pilot RCT and at baseline and 6-monthly interviews for up to 36 months for the cohort study, using standard questionnaires.ResultsPersonalised care was acceptable to patients and proved feasible. The reporting of chest pain in the intervention group was half that of the control group at 6 months, and this reduction was maintained at 1 year. There was also a small improvement in self-efficacy measures in the intervention group at 12 months. Anxiety was more prevalent than depression in our CHD cohort over the 3 years. Nearly half of the cohort complained of chest pain at outset, with two-thirds of these being suggestive of angina. Baseline exertional chest pain (suggestive of angina), anxiety and depression were independent predictors of adverse cardiac outcome. Psychosocial factors predicted the continued reporting of exertional chest pain across the 3 years of follow-up. Costs were slightly lower for the PC group but QALYs were also lower. Neither difference was statistically significant.ConclusionsChest pain, anxiety, depression and social problems are common in patients on CHD registers in primary care and predict adverse cardiac outcomes. Together they pose a complex management problem for GPs and PNs. Our pilot trial of PC suggests a promising approach for treatment of these patients. Generalisation is limited because of the selection bias in recruitment of the practices and the subsequent participation rate of the CHD register patients, and the fact that the research took place in south London boroughs. Future work should explicitly explore methods for effective implementation of the intervention, including staff training needs and changes to practice.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN21615909.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 4, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

show abstract

GPs' beliefs about their management of depression and needs for supporting change in practice.

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Managing depression in primary care: A meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research from the UK to identify barriers and facilitators

Managing depression in primary care: A meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research from the UK to identify barriers and facilitators

UPBEAT-UK: a programme of research into the relationship between coronary heart disease and depression in primary care patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About