2012
DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-0997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPS Device Comparison for Accident Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining the respective ranges (lower bound-upper bound) for the parameter values (feasible domain) 4 Defining a number n c of parameter combinations whose values are uniformly distributed into the feasible domain (step #3) and performing the simulations 5…”
Section: Implementation Of the Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defining the respective ranges (lower bound-upper bound) for the parameter values (feasible domain) 4 Defining a number n c of parameter combinations whose values are uniformly distributed into the feasible domain (step #3) and performing the simulations 5…”
Section: Implementation Of the Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach requires vehicles equipped with data loggers such as Global Positioning System, tachographs and EDR (event data recorder) devices able to record the positions of the vehicle during the accident. These information can be used for the reconstruction; however, some uncertainties can arise from the measurement of the position and from the data analysis [4,24]. When such information are not available, only the second approach can be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%