2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017ja024845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPS‐TEC Observation of Gravity Waves Generated in the Ionosphere During 21 August 2017 Total Solar Eclipse

Abstract: The present work investigates ionospheric effects of the 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse, particularly targeting eclipse‐generated gravity waves in the ionosphere. Ionospheric total electron content (TEC) derived from Global Positioning System (GPS) data obtained from a number of stations located both along and across the path of eclipse totality has been utilized for this purpose. Distinct gravity wave‐like signatures with wave periods around 20–90 min (with dominant peak at 25–30 min wave period) have bee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another remarkable variation seen in Figure 3 was a quick recovery from the eclipse and a large Ne increase that commenced soon after the eclipse, peaking at 23-24 UT. A similar posteclipse increase above the background value was reported in several studies of the 21 August 2017 solar eclipse over many locations across North America (Chen et al, 2018;Cherniak & Zakharenkova, 2018;Nayak & Yigit, 2018;Reinisch et al, 2018), though the TEC increase is weaker in general as it reflects the integrated Ne response over all altitudes. Mechanisms that contribute to a quick recovery and Ne increase after 21 UT could include disturbances in the neutral wind and O/N2 ratio (Chen et al, 2018;Muller-Wodarg et al, 1998).…”
Section: A Summary Of the Midlatitude Electron Density (Ne) Vertical supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Another remarkable variation seen in Figure 3 was a quick recovery from the eclipse and a large Ne increase that commenced soon after the eclipse, peaking at 23-24 UT. A similar posteclipse increase above the background value was reported in several studies of the 21 August 2017 solar eclipse over many locations across North America (Chen et al, 2018;Cherniak & Zakharenkova, 2018;Nayak & Yigit, 2018;Reinisch et al, 2018), though the TEC increase is weaker in general as it reflects the integrated Ne response over all altitudes. Mechanisms that contribute to a quick recovery and Ne increase after 21 UT could include disturbances in the neutral wind and O/N2 ratio (Chen et al, 2018;Muller-Wodarg et al, 1998).…”
Section: A Summary Of the Midlatitude Electron Density (Ne) Vertical supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The findings presented by Nayak and Yigit () and Sun et al () concern the specific TEC disturbance enumerated (2) in our Figure . These authors attributed this feature to an eclipse‐generated gravity wave and to an acoustic shock wave, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The relative amplitude of the latter disturbances is of order of 3–7% of the zeroth‐order modification; thus, we refer to them as first‐order perturbations. Most of these effects have already been identified and discussed in one way or another by Coster et al (), Zhang et al (), Nayak and Yigit (), and Sun et al (). However, these researchers erroneously linked them to the edge of the penumbra (Zhang et al, ), in situ‐generated thermospheric waves (Coster et al, ), or eclipse‐generated gravity waves (Nayak & Yigit, ; Sun et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…When it comes to GWs in the ionosphere, along with meteorological origin in the lower atmosphere (convection, weather fronts, thunderstorms, and wind flow over mountains), they can also originate from the auroral region during geomagnetically disturbed periods (Hocke & Schlegel, 1996). The GWs can also be generated during a solar eclipse (Nayak & Yigit, 2018;Sauli et al, 2006) or more generally during solar terminator passage (Galushko et al, 1998;Somsikov & Ganguly, 1995). Although the GWs play an important role in the dynamics Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 10.1029/2018JA026048 of the upper atmosphere, their role in the ionosphere is still studied insufficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%