2018
DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2017.2776970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GPU-Accelerated Dynamic Wavelet Thresholding Algorithm for X-Ray CT Metal Artifact Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These images are implanted with metals and are projected onto CT sinograms using the FP algorithm; the attenuation coefficient of the implanted metals is set to 7.874 according to the National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) standard. Metal‐corrupted CT sinograms are synthesized using the dynamic wavelet thresholding method for x‐ray CT metal artifact reduction by Peng et al 19 and the dual domain network method for CT metal artifact reduction by Lin et al 31 In addition, to test the clinical efficacy of the proposed method, we evaluate it on a real clinical data (a CT image that contains real metal artifacts), which is shared by the authors of another MAR study 9 . The size of the clinical CT image is 512 × 512.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These images are implanted with metals and are projected onto CT sinograms using the FP algorithm; the attenuation coefficient of the implanted metals is set to 7.874 according to the National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) standard. Metal‐corrupted CT sinograms are synthesized using the dynamic wavelet thresholding method for x‐ray CT metal artifact reduction by Peng et al 19 and the dual domain network method for CT metal artifact reduction by Lin et al 31 In addition, to test the clinical efficacy of the proposed method, we evaluate it on a real clinical data (a CT image that contains real metal artifacts), which is shared by the authors of another MAR study 9 . The size of the clinical CT image is 512 × 512.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical iterative reconstruction MAR methods include algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART), [10][11][12] simultaneous ART (SART), [13][14][15] and statistic iterative reconstruction (SIR). [16][17][18][19] These methods used only uncorrupted sinogram pixels for CT image reconstruction, and did not need to deal with metal-corrupted areas. However, such methods are very time consuming compared to inpainting-based approaches because they need to traverse all the valid sinogram pixels (uncorrupted pixels) in each iteration and they generally take dozens of iterations to reconstruct an image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In continue, some of these methods are reviewed. A dynamic wavelet thresholding metal artifact reduction algorithm was produced by Peng et al [17], which is based on a statistic iterative reconstruction model for CT images. For removing blocky black artifacts caused by incomplete projections, cubic spline interpolation was utilized.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical iterative reconstruction MAR methods can be divided into two groups. One uses projection data outside of the metal trace, which can be regarded as clean data [11,[17][18][19][20][21][22]. The other adopts a statistical objective function to decay corrupted projection data [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%