2005
DOI: 10.1002/asna.200510410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GQLup and its common proper motion companion

Abstract: Abstract. Recently, Neuhäuser et al. (2005a) presented evidence for a sub-stellar, common proper motion companion to GQ Lup. With two theoretical mass estimates, both below the Deuterium burning minimum mass limit, the companion is probably a planet imaged directly. We present here a more detailed astrometric analysis of the GQ Lup system, using all the (different) proper motions published for the primary. The common proper motion is significant in all cases, also when taking into account the error in paralla… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At a known distance, d, the constraint on the stellar mass can be recast as * =  * M d 1.03 0.05 156 pc ( ) ( ) , where the formal uncertainty on M * is ∼5% including systematic uncertainties estimated from more complex models (e.g., vertical structure, see Rosenfeld et al 2013). Previous estimates of the stellar mass of GQ Lup A from the literature are mostly lower than our determination, ranging between 0.7 and 1.05 M e (see discussion in Section 2, Mugrauer & Neuhäuser 2005;Seperuelo Duarte et al 2008;Donati et al 2012). The discrepancy in mass estimates results largely from differences in stellar evolutionary models and uncertainty in the effective temperature.…”
Section: ( )contrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a known distance, d, the constraint on the stellar mass can be recast as * =  * M d 1.03 0.05 156 pc ( ) ( ) , where the formal uncertainty on M * is ∼5% including systematic uncertainties estimated from more complex models (e.g., vertical structure, see Rosenfeld et al 2013). Previous estimates of the stellar mass of GQ Lup A from the literature are mostly lower than our determination, ranging between 0.7 and 1.05 M e (see discussion in Section 2, Mugrauer & Neuhäuser 2005;Seperuelo Duarte et al 2008;Donati et al 2012). The discrepancy in mass estimates results largely from differences in stellar evolutionary models and uncertainty in the effective temperature.…”
Section: ( )contrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Although they adopt a much higher effective temperature of 4300±50 K, Donati et al (2012) obtain a comparable stellar radius of 1.7±0.2 R e . Previous estimates of the mass of GQ Lup A vary between 0.7 and 1.05 M e , largely depending on the evolutionary models and effective temperatures used (Mugrauer & Neuhäuser 2005;Seperuelo Duarte et al 2008;Donati et al 2012). Adopting the higher effective temperature of 4300 K yields a mass of 1.05± 0.07 M e , the upper value in this range (Donati et al 2012).…”
Section: The Gq Lup Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a projected distance of ∼440 AU, the system is probably still below the long-term stability limit of ∼700 AU for a K 7 primary star of 0.7 M , following the argumentation of Weinberg et al (1987) and Close et al (2003) (see also Mugrauer & Neuhäuser 2005, for a discussion).…”
Section: Mass Estimation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, as shown in Mugrauer & Neuhäuser (2005), 2M1207 and its companion (Chauvin et al 2005a) are also exceeding this long-term stability limit at about three times the age of CVSO 30.…”
Section: Aanda-cvso Online Materials P 13mentioning
confidence: 84%