Fourteenth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2022) 2022
DOI: 10.1117/12.2643867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grad-CAM based visualization of 3D CNNs in classifying fMRI

Abstract: Deep learning methods have proven promising performance in decoding specific task states based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the human brain, however, they lack transparency in their decision making, in the sense that it is not straightforward to visualize the features on which the decision was made. In this study, we investigated the decoding of four sensorimotor tasks based on 3D fMRI according to 3D Convolutional Neural Network (3DCNN), and then adopted Grad-CAM algorithms to provide vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GradCAM [47] and GradCAM++ [48] use the layer's gradient to compute coefficients. XGrad-CAM [49] proposes the use of axioms to avoid the use of heuristic methods. LIFT-CAM [50] proposes an analytical solution to the problem.…”
Section: Activation Maximisation (Am)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GradCAM [47] and GradCAM++ [48] use the layer's gradient to compute coefficients. XGrad-CAM [49] proposes the use of axioms to avoid the use of heuristic methods. LIFT-CAM [50] proposes an analytical solution to the problem.…”
Section: Activation Maximisation (Am)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors introduce important properties that an explanation should possess, such as consistency and local fidelity, 9 sensitivity and conservation, 14 or sensitivity and invariance to implementation. 18 Similarly, the fidelity of saliency maps has been assessed using dedicated objective metrics, 10,[12][13][14]55 which are called interchangeably fidelity, reliability, or faithfulness metrics. These metrics consist in perturbing the image processed by the model to determine whether the areas emphasized by the explanation contribute significantly to the class score.…”
Section: Objective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we first review the existing classical methods of CAM [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] and the 129…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%