2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grade 3 open tibial shaft fractures treated with a circular frame, functional outcome and systematic review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
7
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early administration of antibiotics, 4 adequate debridement 39 and early wound cover 40 They reported deep infection rates of 0.9% in 420 patients treated in circular fixators, compared with 11% in 492 patients treated with plate fixation, 10.7% in 625 patients treated with mono-lateral external fixators, 8.7% in 547 patients treated with reamed nailing, and 7.1% in 1 223 patients who were treated with unreamed nails. 41 The difference in deep infection rates between circular fixators and these other fixation methods was found to be statistically significant. (p < 0.001) Deep infection occurred in 4.25% of cases in our series and compares favourably to the published results of other treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Early administration of antibiotics, 4 adequate debridement 39 and early wound cover 40 They reported deep infection rates of 0.9% in 420 patients treated in circular fixators, compared with 11% in 492 patients treated with plate fixation, 10.7% in 625 patients treated with mono-lateral external fixators, 8.7% in 547 patients treated with reamed nailing, and 7.1% in 1 223 patients who were treated with unreamed nails. 41 The difference in deep infection rates between circular fixators and these other fixation methods was found to be statistically significant. (p < 0.001) Deep infection occurred in 4.25% of cases in our series and compares favourably to the published results of other treatment modalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…14 The recent increase in the use of circular external fixators for open tibial fractures is encouraging especially in high energy injuries but this method has to be individualised on a patient-to-patient basis. 15,16 The efficacy of intramedullary nails in the acute management of open tibial fractures is contentious. 17,18 The fear of osteomyelitis has previously precluded any form of internal fixation especially in the immune-compromised host and delays in operative management greater than six hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time to achieve union with Ilizarov fixator varies in different studies since different authors have used different criteria for assessment of union. Inan et al reported bony union in 19 weeks in all type III-A fractures [33] . The average time of union in our study was 16 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%