2013
DOI: 10.1002/bjuiw-2012-091-web
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grade heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as we have very recently demonstrated (13) grade distribution along the whole tumour is quite heterogeneous, and the same may happen with the rest of parameters. So, total tumour sampling shows to be much more precise to assign the real grade of a tumour with significant differences compared with classic sampling (13) This fact supports the need to reconsider current protocols for sampling renal tumours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as we have very recently demonstrated (13) grade distribution along the whole tumour is quite heterogeneous, and the same may happen with the rest of parameters. So, total tumour sampling shows to be much more precise to assign the real grade of a tumour with significant differences compared with classic sampling (13) This fact supports the need to reconsider current protocols for sampling renal tumours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…83). Average tumour diameter was 6 cm (range,[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and the average number of paraffin blocks per case was 30 (range,. Fuhrman grade distribution assigned to the highest area in every case was quite balanced between low grade, with 24 cases (G1 = 9, G2 = 15), and high grade, with 27 cases (G3 = 10, G4 = 17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most worrying finding was that while conventional sampling detected seven cases of high grade carcinoma (Fuhrman grades 3 and 4), total sampling detected 17. This difference in a classical histological parameter with proven prognostic validity was statistically significant (9). There are no similar studies in the literature.…”
Section: Morphological Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Recent studies, however, have demonstrated that more extensive tumour sampling of CCRCC yields data significantly different in terms of tumour grade and tumour cellularity in comparison to conventional sampling [13,14]. For instance, in a recent study, 28 CCRCCs were fully sampled and 17 tumour heterogeneities were found in terms of the presence of high grade areas while conventional sampling of the same tumours did show heterogeneity in 17 cases but high grade areas only in seven [13]. A recent study of 51 consecutively fully sampled CCRCCs reported foci of syncytial cells in eight cases and rhabdoid cells in five.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathologists have known for a long time that CCRCC is frequently microscopically heterogeneous, but studies trying to quantify this issue are rare [12][13][14]. Clinical and molecular data [12][13][14][15] suggest that conventional sampling of kidney tumours [16] probably allows only a partial and insufficient perception of tumour histology. In this context, minor foci of high grade as well as tumour areas with different genetic/epigenetic alterations [17] with impact on tumour behaviour could eventually be missed in some cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%