2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24761-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graded pitch profile for the helicoidal broadband reflector and left-handed circularly polarizing cuticle of the scarab beetle Chrysina chrysargyrea

Abstract: The cuticle of the beetle Chrysina chrysargyrea reflects left-handed polarized light in the broad spectral range from 340 to 1000 nm. Interference oscillations in the experimental Mueller-matrix spectroscopic ellipsometry data reveal that transparent materials comprise the cuticle. A spectral analysis of the interference oscillations makes evident that the pitch profile across the cuticle is graded. The graded pitch and effective refractive indices are determined through non-linear regression analysis of the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (3) is the extended version of those equations valid for a single pitch structure ( λ o = n av P o and Δ λ = Δ nP o , respectively), when considering chiral chirped arrangements. It is conceptually erroneous to apply the equations λ o = n av P o and Δ λ = Δ nP o when considering helical structures with graded pitches, as reported in [58], where λ o was estimated from n av P o to show that the depth-dependent pitch values obtained for the cuticle of silver-like C. chrysargyrea scarabs, based on the analysis of SEM images, are too small to justify the presence of a reflection band extending towards the NIR [35,58]. In these cases, the correct way to explain the effective width of the reflection band is by application of Equations (4)–(6) to obtain the minimum value of λ − and the maximum value of λ + for a specific depth dependence of the pitch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (3) is the extended version of those equations valid for a single pitch structure ( λ o = n av P o and Δ λ = Δ nP o , respectively), when considering chiral chirped arrangements. It is conceptually erroneous to apply the equations λ o = n av P o and Δ λ = Δ nP o when considering helical structures with graded pitches, as reported in [58], where λ o was estimated from n av P o to show that the depth-dependent pitch values obtained for the cuticle of silver-like C. chrysargyrea scarabs, based on the analysis of SEM images, are too small to justify the presence of a reflection band extending towards the NIR [35,58]. In these cases, the correct way to explain the effective width of the reflection band is by application of Equations (4)–(6) to obtain the minimum value of λ − and the maximum value of λ + for a specific depth dependence of the pitch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review with a focus on biomimetics is given by Lenau and Barfoed [21]. During the last decade, Mueller-matrix studies on beetle cuticles have been introduced by Goldstein [22], Hodgkinson [23] and our group [7,9,[24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Structural Optical Activity In Cuticle From Cetonia Auratamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B). First, the structure called rotation is the Bouligand structure observed in biological composites [9,[37][38][39] and extensively reproduced in fibrous composites, and adapted to platelet inclusions. This structure has been hypothesized to filter shear waves [9].…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%