2019
DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2019.1663246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grades and grade inflation: exploring teachers’ grading practices in Indonesian EFL secondary school classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the school accreditation inspection, schools in Indonesia can be accredited hierarchically as outstanding (accredited A), good (accredited B), fair (accredited C), or inadequate school (unaccredited). They desire to achieve the highest accreditation grade for privilege because, as Arsyad Arrafii (2020, p. 490) reported, “[s]chools with an A level of accreditation often receive priority for support and aids [from government] compared to those of a lower level”. Meanwhile teacher factors (e.g., teachers' attainment in UKG—teacher professional and pedagogic tests, or observation of teachers' classroom pedagogic practices) are not counted as a primary consideration during the accreditation inspection (Malik et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the school accreditation inspection, schools in Indonesia can be accredited hierarchically as outstanding (accredited A), good (accredited B), fair (accredited C), or inadequate school (unaccredited). They desire to achieve the highest accreditation grade for privilege because, as Arsyad Arrafii (2020, p. 490) reported, “[s]chools with an A level of accreditation often receive priority for support and aids [from government] compared to those of a lower level”. Meanwhile teacher factors (e.g., teachers' attainment in UKG—teacher professional and pedagogic tests, or observation of teachers' classroom pedagogic practices) are not counted as a primary consideration during the accreditation inspection (Malik et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case where the desired score was not achieved after several tests, the remedy can be terminated and the highest attainment among the post‐remedial tests contributes to the final scores. Teachers are not obliged to give a KKM to students who do not deserve it (MoE, 2017); this is probably linked to the concern over the grade inflation practices (Arsyad Arrafii, 2020). Remedial provision therefore can be associated with formative orientation, despite scores being its final outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arsyad Arrafii (2020) argued that in Indonesia grade inflation is related to a hodgepodge grading and the top-down implementation of the competency-based assessment policies.…”
Section: ) Testing and Grading Practices And Content Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implies grading leniency, i.e., the awarding of higher grades to students' work than the students deserve, which yields a higher average grade given to students. It also means awarding progressively higher academic grades for work that would have received lower grades in the past which means that students' grades are perceived to be an inaccurate representation of their academic knowledge (Hodges, 2014;Arsyad Arrafii, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%