1998
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.1997.3220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient Estimates for Harmonic Functions on Regular Domains in Riemannian Manifolds

Abstract: Derivative formulae for heat semigroups are used to give gradient estimates for harmonic functions on regular domains in Riemannian manifolds. This probabilistic method provides an alternative to coupling techniques, as introduced by Cranston, and allows us to improve some known estimates. We discuss two slightly different ways to exploit derivative formulae where each one should be interesting by itself.1998 Academic Press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7], Section 5, as well as [6]. ✷ In our last application we focus on the case of harmonic functions on rotationally symmetric manifolds.…”
Section: Corollary 22 Let P(t X Y) Be the Smooth Heat Kernel Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7], Section 5, as well as [6]. ✷ In our last application we focus on the case of harmonic functions on rotationally symmetric manifolds.…”
Section: Corollary 22 Let P(t X Y) Be the Smooth Heat Kernel Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x v)(ω, id M ); hence S τ (θ, ω) = sup v∈T x M, |v|=1 |S τ (ω, θ )(v)| is independent of θ . Writing the gradient formula as iterated integral with respect to the initial probability and the Haar measure, and exploiting the mean value property of u, we obtain |grad x u| u(x) E S τ , where the last expectation can be bounded as in [7], Section 5. The method immediately transfers to the Hessian case.…”
Section: Corollary 22 Let P(t X Y) Be the Smooth Heat Kernel Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain the desired result by applying Theorem 3.2 to f n and letting n → ∞. In the case where cut(x) = ∅, we prove the same result by a trick used in part (2) of the proof to Corollary 5.1 in [20]. ✷…”
Section: We Have H 0 (T) = T For T τ (T ) Following the Argument In mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…, where We shall apply Theorem 3.1 by constructing a proper finite energy process t as in [20]. Letting T (t) := t 0 f −2 (x s ) ds for t τ δ , we have…”
Section: Given Two Sections R ∈ (End(e))r ∈ (End(ẽ)) and A Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a constant c depending on t, dim M , dist(x, ∂D) and the lower bound of Ric on D. This follows from Theorem 2.3 with an explicit choice for h. See [8] for the details.…”
Section: Theorem 23 [7]mentioning
confidence: 98%