2021
DOI: 10.1038/s43018-020-00154-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gradient of Developmental and Injury Response transcriptional states defines functional vulnerabilities underpinning glioblastoma heterogeneity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

14
239
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
14
239
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our identified modules encompass two major groups involving developmental and inflammatory/hypoxia-associated transcriptional programs, later referred to as “reactive states”. In contrast to the recent described injury response signature 2 of glioblastoma, our data indicate that two distinct subtypes of reactive states coexist and emerge spatially segregated from each other, Extended Data Figure 5a-b . The first module revealed a strong enrichment in glycolysis-related pathways and those involved in the response to reduced oxygen-levels (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.01, hypergeometric test), therefore named as “Reactive Hypoxia” Extended Data Figure 5a .…”
Section: Articlecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our identified modules encompass two major groups involving developmental and inflammatory/hypoxia-associated transcriptional programs, later referred to as “reactive states”. In contrast to the recent described injury response signature 2 of glioblastoma, our data indicate that two distinct subtypes of reactive states coexist and emerge spatially segregated from each other, Extended Data Figure 5a-b . The first module revealed a strong enrichment in glycolysis-related pathways and those involved in the response to reduced oxygen-levels (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.01, hypergeometric test), therefore named as “Reactive Hypoxia” Extended Data Figure 5a .…”
Section: Articlecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate whether malignant transcriptomes resulted from somatic alterations, we estimated copy number variations (CNVs) from the average expression of genes in large chromosomal regions within each spot, which confirmed the typical gain in chromosome 7 and/or loss in chromosome 10 in the majority of malignant spots, Figure 1c-d and Extended Data Figure 1-3 . The high number of individual copy-number alterations and mutational profiles are assumed to drive patient-specific transcriptional regulation 1 resulting in individual clusters of transcriptomes, similar to results seen in other studies 1,2 .…”
Section: Articlesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…an implementation of some of the discussed algorithms on the patient-derived single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) count matrices from Neftel et al 2 and Richards et al, 3 the clinical relevance of the presented tools, and the insights of the paper are strongly emphasized. Thus, the patient-centered section on cancer networks (section ''Cancer networks'') is to be treated as the heart of the paper.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ''few pediatric GBM samples'' results correspond to six patient samples with N = 846 cells analyzed. The ''few adult GBM samples'' correspond to three adult patient samples with N = 409 cells analyzed from the count matrix found in Neftel et al 2 Finally, the adult glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) analysis correspond to sample BT127_L (N = 500 random cells) from the scRNA-seq counts obtained from Richards et al 3 The source datasets (gene expression count matrices) for these data used to demonstrate some of the algorithms herein are available as .csv and .txt files in the Broad Single Cell Portal links provided in the data and code availability section at the end of this review. The source codes for all discussed algorithms are available in the links provided at the end of the paper and their corresponding citations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%