2014
DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2014.911236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graduate Education for Information Organization, Cataloging, and Metadata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one study participant mentioned her graduate library education, and it was only in reference to undertaking a cataloging internship; she strongly emphasized her on-the-job training. A large number of current graduate level cataloging courses frame the topic in terms of theory and practice (Joudrey and McGinnis, 2014), that is, learning about cataloging vs. learning to do cataloging (Moulaison, 2012), while the actual decision-making witnessed does not fit neatly into those categories. Given the importance of hands-on cataloging practice and the need to support a more ideal balance of theory and practice in cataloging education (Snow & Hoffman 2015), educators need ways of offering the former without compromising the latter.…”
Section: Beyond Judgment: Repertoire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study participant mentioned her graduate library education, and it was only in reference to undertaking a cataloging internship; she strongly emphasized her on-the-job training. A large number of current graduate level cataloging courses frame the topic in terms of theory and practice (Joudrey and McGinnis, 2014), that is, learning about cataloging vs. learning to do cataloging (Moulaison, 2012), while the actual decision-making witnessed does not fit neatly into those categories. Given the importance of hands-on cataloging practice and the need to support a more ideal balance of theory and practice in cataloging education (Snow & Hoffman 2015), educators need ways of offering the former without compromising the latter.…”
Section: Beyond Judgment: Repertoire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have examined coverage of specific topics in LIS Master's degree programmes. These include management (Mackenzie & Smith, 2009), information technology (Singh & Mehra, 2013), cataloguing (King, 2012;Miller, Lee, Olson, & Smiraglia, 2012;Moulaison, 2012), information organisation (Joudrey & McGinnis, 2014) leadership (Hicks & Given, 2013;Phillips, 2014), expert searching (Smith & Roseberry, 2013), social justice and diversity (Bonnici, Maatta, Wells, Brodsky, & Meadows, 2012;Mehra, Olson, & Ahmad, 2011), assessment (Askew & Theodore-Shusta, 2014), intelligence analysis (Jin & Bouthillier, 2012), financial management (Burger, Kaufman, & Atkinson, 2015) and technical services (Albee, 2015). In most cases, the authors suggest that curricula need to be modified to include more coverage of the topics examined.…”
Section: Curriculum Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As LIS curricula continue to change in response to quickly changing areas of information work and important emergent topics, however, many programs are featuring a smaller core of required courses, supplemented by an expanded offering of electives (ur Rehman & Alajmi, 2017, 98). While IO and IR may have once been represented by their own required courses, they may now be combined into one course (Joudrey & McGinnis, 2014, 524), distributed across several courses covering other combinations of LIS topics, or offered as electives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%