2020
DOI: 10.23919/jsee.2020.000038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graduation formula: A new method to construct belief reliability distribution under epistemic uncertainty

Abstract: In reliability engineering, the observations of the variables of interest are always limited due to cost or schedule constraints. Consequently, the epistemic uncertainty, which derives from lack of knowledge and information, plays a vital influence on the reliability evaluation. Belief reliability is a new reliability metric that takes the impact of epistemic uncertainty into consideration and belief reliability distribution is fundamental to belief reliability application. This paper develops a new method cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly used uncertain statistical methods include two types: parametric and nonparametric methods. The parametric methods include the method of moments [130] and the method of graduation formula [131]; the nonparametric methods include the maximum entropy method [132], the distribution average based on the Delphi method [133], and the interpolation method of expert empirical data [40]. To verify whether the obtained uncertainty quantification results match the actual sparse data, the hypothesis testing method under uncertainty measure can also be used [134].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used uncertain statistical methods include two types: parametric and nonparametric methods. The parametric methods include the method of moments [130] and the method of graduation formula [131]; the nonparametric methods include the maximum entropy method [132], the distribution average based on the Delphi method [133], and the interpolation method of expert empirical data [40]. To verify whether the obtained uncertainty quantification results match the actual sparse data, the hypothesis testing method under uncertainty measure can also be used [134].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the end-to-end delay of this LEO-SCN is composed of the processing delay and the propagation delay. This assumption is also applied in [32], in which both the queueing delay and the transmission delay are ignored.…”
Section: End-to-end Delay Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the length of the beam L=100 in, the allowable maximum displacement D=2.5 in, and the rest of the parameters are regarded as uncertain variables because of epistemic uncertainty, whose meaning and distribution information are shown in Table 1. As an additional note, the mean and standard deviation of the uncertain variables can be obtained by the graduation formula [36]. According to the FOBRA algorithm, BRQI of the cantilever beam structure is š›¾ = 1.5499.…”
Section: Reliability Analysis Of the Cantilever Beam Structurementioning
confidence: 99%