2015
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.152393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have suggested that there is no “best” graft for ACL reconstruction [ 23 ]. The ideal graft is biomechanically similar to the native ligament, easily harvested, and incorporates well with bone [ 24 ]. The different types of grafts, however, may influence the recovery of muscle endurance and strength, and this could be a topic of interest for further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have suggested that there is no “best” graft for ACL reconstruction [ 23 ]. The ideal graft is biomechanically similar to the native ligament, easily harvested, and incorporates well with bone [ 24 ]. The different types of grafts, however, may influence the recovery of muscle endurance and strength, and this could be a topic of interest for further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The allograft and xenograft are limited by the tissue availability as well as potential risk of immune rejection and pathogen transmission [3]. The earlier generation of synthetic grafts suffer from the shortcomings of early rupture, loss of mechanical strength over time, insufficient tissue ingrowth and deposition of graft debris [4]. Although the new generation showed better performance, however, these use of these synthetic grafts remain controversial as variable results reported in different clinical reports [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is related to donor site morbidity. The hamstring tendon, on the other hand, is a reliable graft regarding patients exhibiting low pain tolerance and jobs that include kneeling, while less donor site morbidity has been observed ( Dhammi et al, 2015 ). In addition, the graft harvesting needs a relatively small incision, thus, assuring better cosmetic result.…”
Section: Simulation Of Different Surgery Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%