2017
DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graft Function and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplants Improved in the Last Decade: Analysis of the United States Kidney Transplant Database

Abstract: Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main driver of costs seemed to be a result of the increased use of specialized care units and increased costs associated with pneumonia and sepsis diagnosis. Advances in transplantation, such as the development of new immunosuppressive strategies and new surgical techniques, have improved the long-term survival rates of both the graft and the patient, while decreasing the rates of rejection [27,28]. However, even with these successful interventions, infections remain a major complication of transplantation and are large contributors to mortality rates in SOT recipients [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main driver of costs seemed to be a result of the increased use of specialized care units and increased costs associated with pneumonia and sepsis diagnosis. Advances in transplantation, such as the development of new immunosuppressive strategies and new surgical techniques, have improved the long-term survival rates of both the graft and the patient, while decreasing the rates of rejection [27,28]. However, even with these successful interventions, infections remain a major complication of transplantation and are large contributors to mortality rates in SOT recipients [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advances in immunosuppression and immune monitoring, long-term kidney allograft survival has not substantially improved in recent years [1][2][3]. Tenyear allograft failure for deceased donor transplant recipients was 52.8% in 2005 versus 59.2% in 1995 [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in early graft outcomes have been consistently reported across multiple territories, with comparable 1‐year allograft survival rates between Europe and the USA, because of factors such as the reduction in hyperactive rejection resulting from improved immunological characterisation . Intermediate outcomes are also improving, even in the USA, with a reduction in graft failure over the first 3 years despite increasingly deleterious risk factors for graft failure, coincident with the pervasive use of Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate based regimes . However, Lamb et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly the improvements in long‐term outcomes in Ireland compared to jurisdictions such as the US could potentially represent a selection bias, with a more racially, genetically and immunologically heterogeneous donor and recipient profile elsewhere . However, the increased risk of adverse outcomes such as transplant rejection and graft loss known to associate with black race/ethnicity in the USA may not translate to other jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, perhaps further evidence for the importance of nonbiological factors .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation