2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graft-versus-leukemia effect in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: significantly lower relapse rate in unrelated transplantations

Abstract: To determine graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), we studied the outcome of consecutive children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received fully matched marrow allografts comparing relapse rate post HSCT between matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) recipients. Furthermore, we estimated event-free survival (EFS) on the basis of the occurrence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Between 1998 and 2006 we performed 37 f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only incidence of relapse was significantly lower in the unrelated group because of higher incidence of GVHD, proving that GVL is important in pediatric ALL. 16 Furthermore, the very-high-risk infant ALL who benefited from a KIR (killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor) mismatch HSCT also proves that GVL is important in ALL. 17 Our understanding of GVL is still limited and there is no good measure for GVL, and although, historically, GVL has been more associated with chronic myeloid leukemia and AML, and may be least effective in ALL based on DLI response, this may be explained by the different disease kinetics of myeloid compared with lymphoid leukemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, only incidence of relapse was significantly lower in the unrelated group because of higher incidence of GVHD, proving that GVL is important in pediatric ALL. 16 Furthermore, the very-high-risk infant ALL who benefited from a KIR (killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor) mismatch HSCT also proves that GVL is important in ALL. 17 Our understanding of GVL is still limited and there is no good measure for GVL, and although, historically, GVL has been more associated with chronic myeloid leukemia and AML, and may be least effective in ALL based on DLI response, this may be explained by the different disease kinetics of myeloid compared with lymphoid leukemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AML subtypes were classified using the FAB (French-American-British) system. Risk definition and cytogenetic abnormalities were classified according to the United Kingdom Medical research Council (UK-MRC) criteria, favorable if t(8;21), t (15)(16)(17) or inversion 16 were present, unfavorable if À5, À7, del (5q), abn (3q), and complex cytogenetics and standard risk for the remaining.…”
Section: Conditioning Regimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Clinical GVL effect has been associated with a fast recovery of alloreactive effector cells, such as NK cells in HP settings and T cells in MUD settings. 6,7 A recent report has described a delay in T-cell reconstitution using CD3/CD19-depleted grafts and RIC in the HP setting. 8 Furthermore, Dulphy et al 9 have described an immature NK-cell population during the early post-transplant period following unmanipulated HLA-matched HSCTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Despite several advances over the last decade which led to significantly reduced transplantrelated mortality, relapse rates are still high and represent the major cause of death in these patient cohorts. [3][4][5][6] Level of pre-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) has been shown to be an important adverse prognostic parameter for estimating the risk of relapse; MRD, therefore, influences long-term event-free survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. [7][8][9][10][11][12] In particular, patients who relapsed posttransplant have an extremely poor prognosis and need to achieve another hematologic remission or an even more advantageous very low or negative MRD level before proceeding to a subsequent SCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%