1998
DOI: 10.1080/01490459809378074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain size and depth constraints on microbial variability in coastal plain subsurface sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…direct steric hindrance can also affect microorganisms in small pores and restrict their function (Fredrickson et al, 1997;Zhang et al, 1998). Ultimately, decreasing pore throat size may lead to physical size exclusion of bacteria.…”
Section: Metabolic Process Reactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…direct steric hindrance can also affect microorganisms in small pores and restrict their function (Fredrickson et al, 1997;Zhang et al, 1998). Ultimately, decreasing pore throat size may lead to physical size exclusion of bacteria.…”
Section: Metabolic Process Reactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A detailed study on the abundance and activity of aerobic bacteria in pristine aquifers was carried out in two coastal plain sites, Oyster and Abbott Pitt, in Virginia, USA (Zhang et al 1998). In drilling cores of up to 6.5 m length, grain size distribution (GSD), TOC, and microbial abundance and activity were measured in depth intervals between 5 cm and 1 m. Activity was measured by means of acetate incorporation (at Oyster) and glucose mineralisation (at Abbott Pitt).…”
Section: Bacterial Abundance and Activity In Aquifersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homogenisation of solid phase samples prior to analyses makes it possible to characterise the average composition of the microbial communities, while detailed information on their heterogeneous distribution is lost. Zhang et al (1998) assessed the number and activity of bacteria in a sandy aquifer in samples ranging from 0.1 to 100 g. They found little influence of the sampling volume on the microbial communities, which was explained by the nearly homogeneous GSD, ranging from 0.12 to 0.25 mm.…”
Section: Sampling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subsurface microbial communities are often difficult to investigate because subsurface environments are characterized by very high levels of spatial and temporal variability in subsurface hydrological and biogeochemical processes. Considerable spatial variability of microbial distribution in subsurface environments was also observed using traditional microbiological methods (19,43,48).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%