1981
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(81)90142-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain size distribution effects in superplasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, there is an increasing grain size effect. Most of these findings were congruently explained in [16] considering two contributions to creep, one from crystallographic slip and the other of GBS, by the use of the Ghosh and Raj model modification [117], which accounts for the grain size distribution.…”
Section: High Temperature Deformationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Simultaneously, there is an increasing grain size effect. Most of these findings were congruently explained in [16] considering two contributions to creep, one from crystallographic slip and the other of GBS, by the use of the Ghosh and Raj model modification [117], which accounts for the grain size distribution.…”
Section: High Temperature Deformationsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In these cases the distribution of grain sizes (Ghosh and Raj, 1985) will influence the extent of slip locally; although there is no known evidence of changes in texture specific to these circumstances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial work on this topic, in collaboration with Ghosh, [1,2] considered first a bimodal [1] and then a multimodal [2] distribution of the grain size to explain the change in the strain-rate sensitivity index m with the strain rate in the superplastic deformation of aluminum and titanium alloys. [2] The strain-rate dependence of m could be explained by well-spaced transitions of the different grain size domains, from diffusional to powerlaw creep, as the strain rate is increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] The strain-rate dependence of m could be explained by well-spaced transitions of the different grain size domains, from diffusional to powerlaw creep, as the strain rate is increased. The overall envelope of these transitions could explain the shape of the m curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation