1971
DOI: 10.1016/0026-0800(71)90005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain size measurement by the intercept method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After proper identification, the dimensions of these substructures were measured and statistics of the characteristic size were obtained. In the present work, the linear intercept method [20] was used to measure sizes of the PAGS and packets (PS). Equidistant horizontal and vertical lines were drawn (500 using OIM software) and the resulting mean intercept sizes of each line were averaged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After proper identification, the dimensions of these substructures were measured and statistics of the characteristic size were obtained. In the present work, the linear intercept method [20] was used to measure sizes of the PAGS and packets (PS). Equidistant horizontal and vertical lines were drawn (500 using OIM software) and the resulting mean intercept sizes of each line were averaged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] In the literature, various works using the MLI method to measure the size of grains have been proposed. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Willis and Lake [13] used the circle intercept method, and they concluded that the use of different measurement techniques in different laboratories results in significant variations in measured grain diameter and grain size distribution. Furthermore, Karlsson and Gokhale [20] proposed a method for estimating the MLI length of anisotropic structures using vertical sections and trisector methods.…”
Section: The MLI Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,3,4] The main objective of this article is to unambiguously estimate the width or spacing between these homogeneous regions. To this effect, we employed two different methods: a modified version of the mean linear intercept (MLI) method [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and an image analysis method based on spatial autocorrelations. [21][22][23][24][25] …”
Section: An Urgent Need Exists To Develop Quantitativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pearlite colony diameter dC was measured by the linear intercept method [19], consisting of the account of the number of colonies intercepted by a random straight line drawn along the micrograph, considering the randomness of both the metallographic cut and the line and using statistical methods. The interlamellar spacing of pearlite s0 (Figure 2) was calculated by the method of the circular line [20], a variant of the linear intercept method, in which a circle of known length is drawn on the photograph, and the number of intersecting pearlite lamellae is counted (also taking into account the randomness).…”
Section: Microstructural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%