2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain yield and water use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in relation to irrigation levels and rice straw mulching in North West India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
72
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly greater availability of soil water with full and higher irrigations than with deficit irrigation increased plant growth and thereby resulted in higher amount of evapotranspiration. These observations are in agreement with the findings of Ram et al (2013) who reported that ET of wheat increased from 289 mm with two irrigations to 512 mm with five irrigations in Indian Punjab.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Similarly greater availability of soil water with full and higher irrigations than with deficit irrigation increased plant growth and thereby resulted in higher amount of evapotranspiration. These observations are in agreement with the findings of Ram et al (2013) who reported that ET of wheat increased from 289 mm with two irrigations to 512 mm with five irrigations in Indian Punjab.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results of model simulations (BalwinderSingh et al 2011b) suggested that, with mulch, oneirrigation would be saved in about 50% of the years. From a three-year study, Ram et al (2013) showed that under limited irrigation water conditions, rice straw mulching increased yield and water use efficiency in wheat. When wheat is sown with HS after rice harvest in the residual soil moisture eliminates the need for pre-sowing irrigation (Yadvinder-Singh et al 2010b).…”
Section: Y Singh and H S Sidhumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rice residue management in no-till systems (surface retention) provides multiple benefits, including soil moisture conservation, suppression of weeds, improvement in soil quality (Balwinder-Singh et al 2011a, Ram et al 2013Kumar et al 2013;Singh et al 2005;Verhulst et al 2011), reduction in greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to nearly 13 t ha -1 (Mandal et al 2004), and regulates canopy temperature at the grain-filling stage to mitigate the terminal heat effects in wheat (Gupta et al 2010;Jat et al 2009), and significantly improves the C sustainability index (Jat et al 2011). The suppression of weeds with straw mulch might help reduce herbicide requirements (Yadvinder-Singh et al 2010b).…”
Section: Y Singh and H S Sidhumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maurya and Singh (2008) and Ram et al, (2013) also reported a decrease in WUE with an increase in irrigation levels due to proportionately less increase in grain yield with increase in ET. Zhang and Oweis (1999) also observed an increase in grain yield of wheat by 6.8-10.8 kg ha -1 per mm increase in ET.…”
Section: Evapotranspirational Production Function (Etpf) and Its Relamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ram et al, (2013) also reported greater availability of soil water with five irrigations (I 3 ) compared to one (I 1 ) and three irrigations (I 2 ) increased plant growth and thereby resulted in higher amount of ET losses. The observations are in agreement with the findings of Rathore and Patel (1991) who reported that ET of wheat increased from 240 mm with 2 irrigations to 460 mm with five irrigations on clay loam soil in India.…”
Section: Evapotranspirational Production Function (Etpf) and Its Relamentioning
confidence: 99%