2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13199-017-0529-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties is markedly increased by rhizobial inoculation and phosphorus application in Ethiopia

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted to assess plant growth, symbiotic performance and grain yield of common bean in response to rhizobial incoculation and phosphorus application at Galalicha in Southern Ethiopia during the 2012 and 2013 cropping seasons under rain-fed conditions. The treatments consisted of 2 released common bean varieties (Hawassa Dume and Ibbado), 3 levels of Rhizobium inoculation (uninoculated, inoculated with strain HB-429 or GT-9) and 4 levels of phosphorus application (0, 10, 20 and 30 kg P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the average of the two cropping year (2017 and 2018), the GY of the inoculated treatment was about 10.2% higher than the N-fertilized ones. Although the literature still reports that inoculation alone is not able to reach the same levels of productivity of N-fertilization (Bertoldo et al 2015), our results corroborate to authors which found GY values of inoculated common bean higher than those of Nfertilization (Mercante et al 2017;Moreira et al 2017;Samago et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Considering the average of the two cropping year (2017 and 2018), the GY of the inoculated treatment was about 10.2% higher than the N-fertilized ones. Although the literature still reports that inoculation alone is not able to reach the same levels of productivity of N-fertilization (Bertoldo et al 2015), our results corroborate to authors which found GY values of inoculated common bean higher than those of Nfertilization (Mercante et al 2017;Moreira et al 2017;Samago et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In general, plant growth is greatly influenced by soil mineral N, and in N-fixing plants, as soil mineral N levels increase, BNF rates decrease and the uptake of mineral N increases (Goergen et al 2009). However, under very low N availability, plant growth and BNF have been found to be limited by N uptake (Moreau et al 2008) or P availability (Smith 1992;Samago et al 2018). In our experiment, aboveground plant production increased with organic pools of N and P and with N mineralization processes that are only related to readily available forms of N and P (inorganic P, mineral N, and PMN) in the case of chickpea.…”
Section: Soil Fertility Plant Production and Bnfmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…However, there are limiting factors that restrict the use of inoculants in some areas. Biotic and abiotic stresses may affect the effectiveness of the product, making them inefficient in cases such as nutrient-poor or unbalanced soils, salinity, water stress, increasing temperatures, pests and diseases, among others (Bashan et al 2014; Das et al 2017; Khan et al 2017; Thilakarathna and Raizada 2017; Samago et al 2018). To circumvent these factors, several studies have been addressed to gain better knowledge on the intrinsic properties of PGPB, seeking at understanding their optimum growth conditions and interaction with the host plants (Flores-Félix et al 2018; Goulart-Machado et al 2018; Jiménez-Gómez et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%