2019
DOI: 10.1101/726596
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria Share Common Principles to Coordinate Growth and the Cell Cycle at the Single-cell Level

Abstract: Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli are evolutionarily divergent model organisms that have elucidated fundamental differences between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Despite their differences in cell cycle control at the molecular level, both organisms follow the same phenomenological principle for cell size homeostasis known as the adder. We thus asked to what extent B. subtilis and E. coli share common physiological principles in coordinating growth and the cell cycle. To answer th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bacterial growth rate actually began to decline when the culture conditions entered the stationary phase (Hall et al 2013). Furthermore, physiologically, there was an increase in the size of B. subtilis cells in line with the growth rate especially in cell length, while the width was constant (Sauls et al 2019). In this study, the dosage of wheat flour presented an important indicator in influencing the growth rate of vegetative cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The bacterial growth rate actually began to decline when the culture conditions entered the stationary phase (Hall et al 2013). Furthermore, physiologically, there was an increase in the size of B. subtilis cells in line with the growth rate especially in cell length, while the width was constant (Sauls et al 2019). In this study, the dosage of wheat flour presented an important indicator in influencing the growth rate of vegetative cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This led us to directly examine Donachie’s hypothesis on the growth-rate-independent initiation mass 2 , 25 , which is supported by multiple recent reports 3,5,26 and is canonically accepted in numerous modeling studies 3,27 , although challenged in some early studies 7,8,2830 . Our data (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…During the multifork regime, division and initiation continue to co-vary with population mass doubling time, however, elongation rate (and thus C period) plateaus [ 1 ] ( Fig 1 ). Because of this imbalance, new rounds of replication are started prior to completion of the previous one providing an explanation for the multiple origins of replication observed by Cooper and Helmstetter and others, [ 1 , 15 , 17 22 ] including later studies that assess cell size [ 8 , 12 , 23 26 ].…”
Section: The Cooper–helmstetter Model Of Cell Cycle Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%