This paper examines the environmental disclosure initiatives of Niko Resources-a Canadian based multinational oil and gas company-following the two major environmental blowouts at a gas field in Bangladesh in 2005. As part of the examination, we particularly focus on whether Niko's disclosure strategy was associated with public concern pertaining to the blowouts. The findings show that Niko did not provide any non-financial environmental information within its annual reports and press releases as a part of its responsibility to the local community who were affected by the blowouts, but it did produce a stand-alone report to address the issue. However, financial environmental disclosures, such as the environmental contingent liability disclosure, were adequately provided through annual reports to meet the regulatory requirements concerning environmental persecutions. The findings also suggest that Niko's non-financial disclosure within a stand-alone report was associated with the public pressures as measured by negative media coverage towards the Niko's blowouts. This paper concludes that Niko's non-financial environmental disclosure, via introducing a stand-alone report, was because of the survival considerations; Niko's reaction did not suggest any real attempt to hold broader accountability for its activities in a developing country.