2016
DOI: 10.1111/anti.12268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gramsci and the AfricanCittà Futura: Urban Subaltern Politics From the Margins of Nouakchott, Mauritania

Abstract: This article offers reflection on how Gramscian theories can be useful for critically analyzing the political significance of the actions and resistances of urban subaltern Africans. It interrogates the potential of subaltern political forms to profoundly transform society and to thus prepare for the African "future city". It merges a theoretical analysis of Gramsci's concepts relating to the città futura-and its relation to concepts of city, subalternity, political initiative and cittadinanza-with a comparati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these examinations dialogue with the so-called 'Southern turn' in urban studies (Lawhon and Truelove 2020). These analyses speak to a vast literature which serves to animate a multitude of ongoing practices and processes related to urban evictions, slum removals, dispossessions, displacement, and gentrification on the one hand, and the related lenses of collective action, resistance and slum habitus on the other (Bayat 2000;Benjamin 2008;Banerjee-Guha 2010;Goldman 2011;Ghertner 2011;Watson 2013;Gillespie 2015;Choplin and Ciavolella 2016;Wilhelm-Solomon 2016;Brickell, Fernandez Arrigoitia, and Vasudevan 2017;Leitner and Sheppard 2017).…”
Section: Temporary Horizons At Awoshie Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these examinations dialogue with the so-called 'Southern turn' in urban studies (Lawhon and Truelove 2020). These analyses speak to a vast literature which serves to animate a multitude of ongoing practices and processes related to urban evictions, slum removals, dispossessions, displacement, and gentrification on the one hand, and the related lenses of collective action, resistance and slum habitus on the other (Bayat 2000;Benjamin 2008;Banerjee-Guha 2010;Goldman 2011;Ghertner 2011;Watson 2013;Gillespie 2015;Choplin and Ciavolella 2016;Wilhelm-Solomon 2016;Brickell, Fernandez Arrigoitia, and Vasudevan 2017;Leitner and Sheppard 2017).…”
Section: Temporary Horizons At Awoshie Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent global rise of ethno‐racial nationalism and violence has recalibrated these discourses through notions of belonging to unevenly code and distribute care and dispossession (Wilhelm‐Solomon, ) and thereby bolster state legitimacy under potentially volatile conditions. While I focus on the Indian conjuncture below, similar urban dynamics exist in Africa (Choplin and Ciavolella, ), Latin America (Koster and Nuijten, ), and Asia (Shin and Kim, ). Conjunctural analysis reveals how and when these governing spaces and meanings gain salience to consolidate state hegemony.…”
Section: Redevelopment and State Space In The ‘Urban Age’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tension arises partly from the frictions of highly unequal societies and partly from the specific historical conditions of state formation (Hesketh, 2019), which have frequently included violent coercion in colonial and postcolonial societies (Ceceña, 2008; Braga and Purdy, 2019). Therefore, rather than asking whether or not hegemony is realized through the successful universalization and active acceptance of political strategies and interests, we build on work that focuses on the strategies, sets of ideas or policies relevant for achieving universalized acceptance across various scales on a daily basis (Andreucci and Radhuber, 2017; Choplin and Ciavolella, 2017; Salem, 2018). Analysing the different understandings underlying daily practices can unpack, for example, how bureaucrats break rules that guide them in sanctioning certain practices, or how local‐level policies, resulting from demands of subaltern groups, contradict or circumvent hegemonic understandings of national‐level policy.…”
Section: Hegemonymentioning
confidence: 99%