2002
DOI: 10.1080/0790062022000006880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grand Coulee Dam 70 Years Later: What Can We Learn?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall demand stagnated and even dropped in the U.K. ( Figure 1). Greater awareness emerged about the (still hotly debated) effects and (often un- quantified) costs of hydraulic development, particularly large dams: extirpation of species (particularly fish); displacement of communities; flooding of cultural sites; contamination of water sources; disruption of ecological processes; and environmental degradation (WCD 2000;Graf 2001;Ortolano and Cushing 2002;Biswas 2004). Greater awareness emerged about the (still hotly debated) effects and (often un- quantified) costs of hydraulic development, particularly large dams: extirpation of species (particularly fish); displacement of communities; flooding of cultural sites; contamination of water sources; disruption of ecological processes; and environmental degradation (WCD 2000;Graf 2001;Ortolano and Cushing 2002;Biswas 2004).…”
Section: Water Supply: the State Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall demand stagnated and even dropped in the U.K. ( Figure 1). Greater awareness emerged about the (still hotly debated) effects and (often un- quantified) costs of hydraulic development, particularly large dams: extirpation of species (particularly fish); displacement of communities; flooding of cultural sites; contamination of water sources; disruption of ecological processes; and environmental degradation (WCD 2000;Graf 2001;Ortolano and Cushing 2002;Biswas 2004). Greater awareness emerged about the (still hotly debated) effects and (often un- quantified) costs of hydraulic development, particularly large dams: extirpation of species (particularly fish); displacement of communities; flooding of cultural sites; contamination of water sources; disruption of ecological processes; and environmental degradation (WCD 2000;Graf 2001;Ortolano and Cushing 2002;Biswas 2004).…”
Section: Water Supply: the State Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K (1961-2000). quantified) costs of hydraulic development, particularly large dams: extirpation of species (particularly fish); displacement of communities; flooding of cultural sites; contamination of water sources; disruption of ecological processes; and environmental degradation (WCD 2000;Graf 2001;Ortolano and Cushing 2002;Biswas 2004). With threats to human health from water-borne diseases, such as typhoid, having been brought under control, concern began to focus on nonpoint sources of pollution and other contaminants, as evidenced by Clean Water legislation in the United States and similar legislation on water quality in the European Union.…”
Section: Water Supply: the State Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What effect will the realization that those federal reserved water rights implicit in tribal treaty records established water rights prior to nearly all established and current water uses have on future allocations? Add to the mix the newly evolved value of in-stream fl ow, which necessitates leaving some water in the stream rather than allocating every drop of a river, and the picture changes again (Rodgers 1993;Ellis 1996;Neuman 1998;Ortolono 2000Ortolono , 2002.…”
Section: Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building new hydropower stations can ease the energy shortage problem, but ecological environment in the area will undergo significant changes after the construction of them (Veltrop, 1998;Ortolano et al, 2002;Zhao et al, 2006;Dong, 2006). To monitor, analyze and evaluate these changes is one of the premises for the construction of the hydropower stations to pass the approval of the government (OECD, 1996), and the environmental impact assessment now becomes more important when hydropower station construction attracts fierce debates on its merits and demerits both at home and abroad, in which biomass loss estimation is one of the important jobs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%