2009
DOI: 10.1017/s175569100901603x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granite formation: Stepwise accumulation of melt or connected networks?

Abstract: Several authors have proposed that granitic melt accumulation and transport from the source region occurs in networks of connected melt-filled veins and dykes. These models envisage the smallest leucosomes as ‘rivulets’ that connect to feed larger dykes that form the ‘rivers’ through which magma ascends through the sub-solidus crust. This paper critically reviews this ‘rivulets-feeding-rivers’ model. It is argued that such melt-filled networks are unlikely to develop in nature, because melt flows and accumulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this macroscopic picture has been used to infer the large-scale geometry of the migration of melt through the crust (e.g. Brown, 2004), it is an incomplete picture of the segregation and migration process (Bons et al, 2004(Bons et al, , 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this macroscopic picture has been used to infer the large-scale geometry of the migration of melt through the crust (e.g. Brown, 2004), it is an incomplete picture of the segregation and migration process (Bons et al, 2004(Bons et al, , 2010.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magma ascent within self‐propagating hydrofractures has been suggested as an alternative mechanism for the ascent of magma from source (Bons & van Milligen, ; Bons et al ., ). Self‐propagating hydrofractures can develop independently of large source reservoirs and their propagation is driven by the pressure differential that arises within the fracture due to the density contrast between the granitic magma (2.3–2.4 g cm −3 ) and the wall rocks (~2.7 g cm −3 ; Sleep, ; Bons et al ., ; Kisters et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gneiss domes develop in exhuming orogens, where they constitute an efficient mechanism for material and heat advection of continental crust during orogenesis (Vanderhaeghe, 2009;Whitney et al, 2004). Furthermore, Gneiss dome formation is an important mechanism for the differentiation of the continental crust and for the genesis of granitic magmas that in turn interact with the dome formation (Bons et al, 2010;Brown, 2007Brown, , 2013Vanderhaeghe, 2009). Dome formation may be accompanied by heat advection expressed by low-pressure/high-temperature metamorphism in the host rocks (Tirel et al, 2009;White et al, 2003;Whitney et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%