1993
DOI: 10.2172/10107775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granular-bed and ceramic candle filters in commercial plants: A comparison

Abstract: Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products^ Images are produced from the best available original document.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recognizing these limitations, the Department of Energy sponsored a new program for the development of a GBF which would be smaller, less complicated and cost competitive with candle filters. Under this program, Combustion Power reviewed the design of granular-bed filters and came to the conclusion that the most effective method of packaging a GBF is to have large filters up to 20 ft in diameter (Wilson, 1993). The filter geometry tested at NYU was scaled to large sized filters to maximize the chances of having a successful filter configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing these limitations, the Department of Energy sponsored a new program for the development of a GBF which would be smaller, less complicated and cost competitive with candle filters. Under this program, Combustion Power reviewed the design of granular-bed filters and came to the conclusion that the most effective method of packaging a GBF is to have large filters up to 20 ft in diameter (Wilson, 1993). The filter geometry tested at NYU was scaled to large sized filters to maximize the chances of having a successful filter configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%