2012
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Granular flow experiments on the interaction with stationary runout path materials and comparison to rock avalanche events

Abstract: The central focus of this work is to study the processes acting well below the surface of a moving rock or debris avalanche during travel over stationary substrate material. Small‐scale physical models at a linear scale of 1:104 used coal as avalanche analogue material and different granular material simulating sedimentary substrates varying in frictional resistance, thickness and relative basal boundary roughness, as well as inerodible, non‐deformable runout path conditions. Substrate materials with the least… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In experiments on dense granular flows moving over an erodible bed, Rowley et al [] and Dufresne [] also observed waves in the bed that were generated by entrainment of the substrate. In both these studies, the waves were preserved in the deposits unlike in our experiments where the erosion waves disappeared as the flow front decelerated (Figure i).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In experiments on dense granular flows moving over an erodible bed, Rowley et al [] and Dufresne [] also observed waves in the bed that were generated by entrainment of the substrate. In both these studies, the waves were preserved in the deposits unlike in our experiments where the erosion waves disappeared as the flow front decelerated (Figure i).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments on granular collapse over horizontal and inclined erodible beds have been performed recently to investigate and quantify erosion processes [ Mangeney et al , , ; Iverson et al , ; Dufresne , ; Roche et al , ]. Mangeney et al [] have shown that erosion processes affect the flow behavior above a critical slope angle θ c that is about half the repose angle θ r of the granular material (θc12θr2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important uncertainties relate to estimation of rheological properties and the role of intermediate storage or entrainment. Size effects critically influence the mobility of rock slope failures greater than~10 6 m 3 and topography and trajectory effects modulate runout length (Evans et al, 1989;Hewitt et al, 2008;Dufresne, 2012). However, size, topography and trajectory effects also influence smaller magnitude events and explain why deposits of different rockfall magnitudes occur in different positions (Krautblatter et al, 2012b), and thereby why most studies fail to cover the entire magnitude spectrum of rock slope erosion.…”
Section: Why Is There No Universal Law For Rock Slope Erosion?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel to field investigations, many scaled laboratory experiments of granular flows have been conducted since the 1980s to better understand the dynamics and deposition of landslides (e.g., see reviews; Andreotti et al, ; Delannay et al, ; GdR Midi, ). These experiments include horizontal axisymmetrical granular column collapses (e.g., Lajeunesse et al, ; Lube et al, ; Roche et al, ) and 2‐D granular collapses in horizontal (Balmforth & Kerswell, ; Lacaze & Kerswell, ; Lube et al, ; Roche et al, , ; Siavoshi & Kudrolli, ) or inclined flat channels (Dufresne, ; Farin et al, ; Hogg, ; Huang et al, ; Lube et al, ; Mangeney et al, ; Sulpizio et al, ). In particular, Mangeney et al () and Farin et al () showed the existence of a critical slope angle above which the dynamics of granular flows change dramatically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%