2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.102.053312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph-based flow modeling approach adapted to multiscale discrete-fracture-network models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we can define the interfacial length between the sub‐networks as normalΓ=ijfalse‖fifjfalse‖2emsuchthat2emfiΩ2emand2emfjΩ, ${\Gamma}=\sum\limits _{ij}{\Vert}{f}_{i}\cap {f}_{j}{\Vert}\qquad \text{such}\,\text{that}\qquad {f}_{i}\in {{\Omega}}^{\prime }\qquad \,\text{and}\,\qquad {f}_{j}\in {{\Omega}}^{\ast },$ where ‖ f i ∩ f j ‖ is the length of the intersection between two fractures. We define the secondary network to be comprised of all dead‐end structures, that is, dead‐end fractures and cycles, and the primary sub‐network is its complement (Doolaeghe et al., 2020). This partitioning definition is based solely on the network structure, specifically the topology/connectivity, and does not utilize any hydraulic, geometric, or flow information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then we can define the interfacial length between the sub‐networks as normalΓ=ijfalse‖fifjfalse‖2emsuchthat2emfiΩ2emand2emfjΩ, ${\Gamma}=\sum\limits _{ij}{\Vert}{f}_{i}\cap {f}_{j}{\Vert}\qquad \text{such}\,\text{that}\qquad {f}_{i}\in {{\Omega}}^{\prime }\qquad \,\text{and}\,\qquad {f}_{j}\in {{\Omega}}^{\ast },$ where ‖ f i ∩ f j ‖ is the length of the intersection between two fractures. We define the secondary network to be comprised of all dead‐end structures, that is, dead‐end fractures and cycles, and the primary sub‐network is its complement (Doolaeghe et al., 2020). This partitioning definition is based solely on the network structure, specifically the topology/connectivity, and does not utilize any hydraulic, geometric, or flow information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ‖f i ∩ f j ‖ is the length of the intersection between two fractures. We define the secondary network to be comprised of all dead-end structures, that is, dead-end fractures and cycles, and the primary sub-network is its complement (Doolaeghe et al, 2020). This partitioning definition is based solely on the network structure, specifically the topology/connectivity, and does not utilize any hydraulic, geometric, or flow information.…”
Section: Flow and Reactive Transport Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dimension reduction drastically reduces the number of degrees of freedom in the solution matrix increasing the computational efficiency. There has been a recent re‐interest in these CN models, which are now commonly referred to as graph‐based emulators (see Section 5), as they allow for significantly more fractures to be included in networks compared to high‐fidelity DFN models, which in turn facilitates and allows for many more simulations to be performed at low cost to bound uncertainty (Berrone et al., 2020; Doolaeghe et al., 2020; Hyman et al., 2018; Karra et al., 2018; O’Malley et al., 2018; Osthus et al., 2020), a topic which is discussed further in the next section. The CN approach is attractive when there are a large number of fractures or when the fracture intersections or solution enhanced permeability are a dominant factor in determining where flow and transport occur within the network.…”
Section: Models Of T‐h‐m‐c Coupled Processes In Fractured Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barthelemy (2018) refers to these types of representations as "primal" and "dual" forms, respectively. Others, such as Doolaeghe et al (2020), call the two representations "intersection graphs" and "fracture graphs".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%