2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph Based Skeleton Motion Representation and Similarity Measurement for Action Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
81
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We achieved the best recognition accuracy by SPMF Inception-ResNet-222 network configuration with a total average accuracy of 98.56%. This result outperforms many previous studies [16,23,7,10,9,24,25,26,27]. For the NTU-RGB+D dataset [11], we achieved an accuracy of 78.89% on crosssubject evaluation and 86.15% on cross-view evaluation as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…We achieved the best recognition accuracy by SPMF Inception-ResNet-222 network configuration with a total average accuracy of 98.56%. This result outperforms many previous studies [16,23,7,10,9,24,25,26,27]. For the NTU-RGB+D dataset [11], we achieved an accuracy of 78.89% on crosssubject evaluation and 86.15% on cross-view evaluation as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…We use dropout (0.5) and data augmentation to avoid overfitting. All regularization parameters were Method Accuracy Grassmann Manifold [48] 88.5 Histogram of 3D Joints [67] 90.9 Riemannian Manifold [17] 91.5 Key-Pose-Motifs [59] 93.5 LARP + mfPCA [2] 94.8 Action snippets [58] 96.5 ST LSTM + Trust Gates [36] 97.0 Lie Group [57] 97.1 Graph-based [62] 97.4 ST-NBNN [64] 98.0 SCK + DCK [32] 98.2 DPRL + GCNN [52] 98.5 GCA-LSTM (direct) [37] 98.5 CNN + Kernel Feature Maps [56] 98.9 GCA-LSTM (stepwise) [37] 99.0 CNN + LSTM [41] 99.0 KRP FS [12] 99.0 DeepGRU 100.0 determined via cross-validation on a subset of the training data. Across all experiments we use three types of data augmentation: (1) random scaling with a factor 2 of ±0.3, (2) random translation with a factor of ±1, (3) synthetic sequence generation with gesture path stochastic resampling (GPSR) [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lie Group [14] 97.1 2014 LARP+mfPCA [66] 94.9 2015 SPGK [13] 97.4 2016 ST-NBNN [16] 98.0 2017 Bi-LSTM [22] 96.9 2018 ST-LSTM(Tree) + Trust Gate [23] 97.0 2018 DPRL [34] 98.5 2018 GR-GCN (Bone only) 96.9 GR-GCN (Bone + Intra-connection) 97.4 Complete GR-GCN model 98.5…”
Section: Methods Accuracy Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lie Group [14] 90.9 2014 LARP+mfPCA [66] 89.7 2015 Rolling Rotations [67] 91.4 2016 SPGK [13] 91.6 2016 Transion Forests [68] 94.2 2017 MIMTL [69] 95.3 2017 Bi-LSTM [22] 93.0 2018 Deep STGC K [33] 99.1 2018 GR-GCN (Bone only) 95.5 GR-GCN (Bone + Intra-connection) 95.6 Complete GR-GCN model 98.4 effectiveness of the proposed graph construction, in which the temporal connectivities are vital.…”
Section: Methods Accuracy Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%