2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph Embedded Pose Clustering for Anomaly Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even under the harsh conditions, we have achieved a definite improvement compared with other methods. Our AUC value is 92.1% and the EER value is 13.4%, which also outperforms the state‐of‐the art methods 32–34 . Overall, the test shows that the desired results are achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even under the harsh conditions, we have achieved a definite improvement compared with other methods. Our AUC value is 92.1% and the EER value is 13.4%, which also outperforms the state‐of‐the art methods 32–34 . Overall, the test shows that the desired results are achieved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Figure 8 are the ROC curve between the proposed method and the other four methods. As ShanghaiTech is a new data set for abnormal event detection, there are only a few recent studies 14,32–34 reporting results on it. Comparing with these latest algorithms, the CGDL 14 method seems to be a slightly better preference in terms of EER.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, our poseguided strategy consistently outperforms the random one in terms of accuracy and training efficiency. The Graph Embedded Pose Clustering (GEPC) method [Markovitz et al, 2020] performs sililar to our strategy. Besides, it can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By changing the threshold gradually, we can arrive at a ROC curve. The above methods learn normal feature pattern [23,24], normal frame prediction [21,26], and normal skeleton pattern [13,14]. As abnormal video has not been seen in training, therefore, the unsupervised methods get lower performance than the supervised methods.…”
Section: Comparison With Unsupervised Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%