2018
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.20802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graph limits of random graphs from a subset of connected k‐trees

Abstract: For any set Ω of non‐negative integers such that 0 1 , we consider a random Ω‐ k ‐tree G n , k that is uniformly selected from all connected k ‐trees of ( n + k ) vertices such that the number of ( k + 1)‐cliques that contain any fixed k ‐clique belongs to Ω. We prove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We apply results for extended fringe subtrees of random enriched trees to provide a Benjamini-Schramm limit of random k-trees. Even more ambitiously, we verify total variational convergence of o( √ n)-neighbourhoods, which is the strongest possible form of convergence in this context, as the diameter of random k-trees has order √ n [47]. We compare the limit graph with a local limit established in [47] that encodes convergence of neighbourhoods around a random k-clique.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We apply results for extended fringe subtrees of random enriched trees to provide a Benjamini-Schramm limit of random k-trees. Even more ambitiously, we verify total variational convergence of o( √ n)-neighbourhoods, which is the strongest possible form of convergence in this context, as the diameter of random k-trees has order √ n [47]. We compare the limit graph with a local limit established in [47] that encodes convergence of neighbourhoods around a random k-clique.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Even more ambitiously, we verify total variational convergence of o( √ n)-neighbourhoods, which is the strongest possible form of convergence in this context, as the diameter of random k-trees has order √ n [47]. We compare the limit graph with a local limit established in [47] that encodes convergence of neighbourhoods around a random k-clique. The limit objects are distinct, which is already evident from the different behaviour of the degree of a random vertex and a vertex of a random front.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Rayleigh distribution has been observed to arise as scaling limit of the distance of independent random vertices in random labelled k-trees by Darrasse and Soria [6], but the scaling constant of (2.10) differs from the labelled case. Drmota and both authors [8] gave a scaling limit for random labelled k-trees, of course also with a different scaling constant.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drmota and the first author [7] established the following result, which shows the dominating role of the cycle type 1 k in this context. The class of labelled k-trees admits a recursive decomposition [8] that is based on k-trees rooted at a front of distinguishable vertices. Two such elements are considered isomorphic if there is a graph isomorphism that pointwise preserves the root-front.…”
Section: K-trees Rooted At a Front Of Distinguishable Verticesmentioning
confidence: 99%